From Duty to be Armed to Permission to Carry [More]
This 2017 post by Publius Huldah cautions why we ought to take a look at what happens at the end before we join the headlong, enthusiastic, and unquestioning rush down the "reciprocity" chute.
England once shared the "duty to be armed" with their North American colonists. In fact, one could make a good case that attempts by the king's men to curtail rights considered part of being an Englishmen as one of the factors that aggravated if not started the breach.
Thank you, David! Amazingly, various "gun rights" people and organizations objected to my opposition to the proposed federal act.
ReplyDeleteEngland once shared the "duty to be armed" with their North American colonists. In fact, one could make a good case that attempts by the king's men to curtail rights considered part of being an Englishmen as one of the factors that aggravated if not started the breach.
ReplyDeleteThat all ended in 1920.
https://www.nraila.org/articles/19990716/lost-battles-lost-rights-by-david-kope