The state contends it should have exclusive authority to regulate firearms within its borders. But the MUS Board of Regents “has come to this court with the claim that they are the better entity to regulate bearing arms by individuals while on university campuses,” the amicus brief states. The disagreement is likened to “competing relatives seeking guardianship over a child unable to exercise rights in their own name” in the brief. [More]
So legal incompetents can vote? Oh, yeah, I guess they can.
I don't suppose when they get all outraged and demand changes to university policy or curricula, or the banning of speakers that trigger tantrums, they can be told that children should be seen and not heard, and appropriately disciplined by the adults for unacceptable behavior?
I don't suppose treating young adults like adults, with adult expectations -- and adult repercussions -- is on the table?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.