![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWlqi3vg7OKYT0JKSW8FrsDPlcTZaUturLdDMm_Jh3GATB73NX1j77rWo1QQW87MbAvQC-_g5t9WsFY6XYSiX2N6bS9IOrr4Fb1Bj-VFxcMbhXTlN50rqoN_HOSngXH8bng0udVw/s320/Dr+Form+Inquiry1168.jpg)
Britney Spears' weekend trip to church sparked controversy yesterday when a security guard pulled a gun on a photographer...
The paparazzo was detained and later released.
And the bodyguard wasn't arrested?
What's a gun control-endorsing celebrity doing with an armed escort, anyway? Nice double standard, Britney.
Hey - if Rosie O'Donnell can do it, why can't Britney?
ReplyDeleteI commented on this one also.
ReplyDeleteWhere would you or I be if we pulled a firearm on a person in California for taking our picture?
I guess rules for "celebrities" and there entourage are different than the rules for the unwashed masses.
who detained the photog?
ReplyDeleteif it was any one of us wouldn't that be kidnapping?
Britney should just keep taking her crazy pills and fade from public view. She's turned into a parody of herself as a sleazy whore.
ReplyDeleteHypocritical don't surprise me anymore, so neither does this. What does surprise me is that anyone takes her, or others like her, seriously anymore.
http://therealgunguys.blogspot.com
I think whores are a protected species in California. Else Sacramento would be a ton of whores er,,uh, ....ahem politicians short.
ReplyDeleteBritney just falls under the umbrella. Only the worthless qualify.
Is the bodyguard immune from "brandishing" law? Or did that camera look life threatening?
ReplyDelete