My comment to the question: (Granted the part about someone else's opinion being worthless may have been a little over the top.)
"... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Just what part of that statement do you not understand? Have you noticed the period (.) located directly following the word "infringed"? Do you understand that the existence and meaning of that period cannot be debated? Have you bothered to determine the definition of "infringed"? Do you understand that the 2nd Amendment was added to the Constitution of this United States, and as an amendment was intended to, and does, overrule any section or phrase of the Constitution that preceded it and contradicts it?
Any argument that you wish to advance will be merely opinion on your part and has no value.
I hope Suzanna Gratia Hupp weighs in. She'll tear them a new one.
ReplyDeleteWhy should we bother with "legally owned", when the tyrants change laws at will to render illegal what was once legal?
ReplyDeleteThere is only one type of illegal gun in America, that is the gun that has been stolen from its lawful owner.
ReplyDeleteNo weapon, of any kind, is legitimately "illegal" due to its form or function.
My comment to the question: (Granted the part about someone else's opinion being worthless may have been a little over the top.)
ReplyDelete"... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Just what part of that statement do you not understand? Have you noticed the period (.) located directly following the word "infringed"? Do you understand that the existence and meaning of that period cannot be debated? Have you bothered to determine the definition of "infringed"? Do you understand that the 2nd Amendment was added to the Constitution of this United States, and as an amendment was intended to, and does, overrule any section or phrase of the Constitution that preceded it and contradicts it?
Any argument that you wish to advance will be merely opinion on your part and has no value.
[W3]