The sheeple line up by the thousands anyway, and will become very agitated if anyone delays the livestock inspection and loading by talking about RIGHTS. Last time I flew -- which was the LAST time -- they got very angry because my (nonmagnetic) brass belt buckle set off the metal detector. I saw a man with a very heavy and solid-looking walking cane pass through, though. Something to think about. A sprained ankle can happen to anyone, any time... David, I get a 403 spam message on the second link. There's a hyperlink on it to bypass the message and go to the article about backscatter scanners.
Yeah, you know, that's like the second time this has happened when I've given fourthamendment.com a link--calling someone a spammer for giving them a referral seems really counterproductive. I just sent this to their contact edress: If you guys don't want referral traffic, let me know and I won't send readers to your website any more. http://waronguns.blogspot.com/2010/10/outreach-to-antis.html http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1&title=more_on_naked_scanners_at_airports&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
I don't need to have my reputation sullied trying to do another site a service.
I'd naturally ask "which damn thing", but then you'd just say "yes".
ReplyDelete___________________
CAPTCHA phrase: malister
You didn't click on the first link?
ReplyDeleteThe sheeple line up by the thousands anyway, and will become very agitated if anyone delays the livestock inspection and loading by talking about RIGHTS.
ReplyDeleteLast time I flew -- which was the LAST time -- they got very angry because my (nonmagnetic) brass belt buckle set off the metal detector. I saw a man with a very heavy and solid-looking walking cane pass through, though. Something to think about.
A sprained ankle can happen to anyone, any time...
David, I get a 403 spam message on the second link. There's a hyperlink on it to bypass the message and go to the article about backscatter scanners.
Yeah, you know, that's like the second time this has happened when I've given fourthamendment.com a link--calling someone a spammer for giving them a referral seems really counterproductive. I just sent this to their contact edress:
ReplyDeleteIf you guys don't want referral traffic, let me know and I won't send readers to your website any more.
http://waronguns.blogspot.com/2010/10/outreach-to-antis.html
http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1&title=more_on_naked_scanners_at_airports&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
I don't need to have my reputation sullied trying to do another site a service.