Notes from the Resistance...
There were so many rational comments opposed to the NYT editorial they've stopped taking them.
Still fixated on the NRA as the great enemy. That's hilarious. They really have no clue.
But they have the right to vote -- what does the NYT think of that?
I wonder if they are including the young men and women in the armed forces?
Apparently not much, Mack. It looks to me like they culled a lot of pro-gun comments and kept every one that supported their agenda. I say that because I just don't believe that the ratio of anti-gun to pro-gun comments is real.
Excellent idea. In sum, following the logical path, the NYT believes the U.S. shouldn't allow anyone under the age of 21 into the military.Heaven forbid that an 18 year old armed National Guardsman be allowed to patrol the streets of NY armed, of called to duty.
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
There were so many rational comments opposed to the NYT editorial they've stopped taking them.
ReplyDeleteStill fixated on the NRA as the great enemy. That's hilarious. They really have no clue.
ReplyDeleteBut they have the right to vote -- what does the NYT think of that?
ReplyDeleteI wonder if they are including the young men and women in the armed forces?
ReplyDeleteApparently not much, Mack. It looks to me like they culled a lot of pro-gun comments and kept every one that supported their agenda. I say that because I just don't believe that the ratio of anti-gun to pro-gun comments is real.
ReplyDeleteExcellent idea. In sum, following the logical path, the NYT believes the U.S. shouldn't allow anyone under the age of 21 into the military.
ReplyDeleteHeaven forbid that an 18 year old armed National Guardsman be allowed to patrol the streets of NY armed, of called to duty.