Tuesday, August 02, 2011

If ATF can’t tell us what a ‘firearm’ is, who can?

It’s more than just chasing after a rumor, which would be easy to dismiss or just flat-out ignore. A friend of mine has given me a real-world example, and per the concern I expressed yesterday, it involves a completely different firearm and a completely different caliber—meaning precedent has already been established—years ago—to mess with millions of gun owners based entirely on mercurial and mutable agency inconsistencies in application of rules.[More]
Another Gun Rights Examiner column for today...make all the news that needs to be shared stop!  Shoot, it's after 4:00 pm and I haven't even started on my radio show research for tomorrow yet...

3 comments:

  1. I don't need some brainless, ball-less, idiot bureaucrat or enforcer to tell me what a firearm is. And I don't "need" them to tell me whether or not I have their permission to own one either. "Shall NOT be infringed", MFers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Akins stocks, Oloson's malf, shoelaces, airsoft toys...

    I would say the gloryholing perverts at ATF consider _everything_ a machine gun until proven otherwise, except that they don't accept proofs to the contrary.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Since they say that a shoestring and rubber band is a machine gun, they can tell us anything, kill or imprison the "perpetrator", and get away with it.

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.