Friday, December 21, 2012

You Know That "National Conversation on Guns" All the Antis Wanted to Have?

It was never really a conversation. It wasn't even a monologue. It was a dictation of the terms of surrender: Obey or die. [Read

Good job, Kurt, as always.

I'm exhausted, it's snowing, I've had a hell of a day, it's Friday night and I'm shutting down. Don't expect emails answered or comments moderated for the rest of the day. 

8 comments:

  1. They missed one other choice that we have: kill the tyrant.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The only conversation you need have with lunatics, such as liberal leftists, is to say, "NO!"

    End of conversation. My rights are not negotiable.

    Screw trying to convince them. They are not rational and you cannot even have an honest debate with them.

    So, my final word is, NO.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Take some time off, David.

    I hope you and yours have a very Merry Christmas!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The 2A as THE EGALITARIAN CLAUSE

    "All men are created equal."

    What other nation proffers such a broad Egalitarian Clause—what academics should have called the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights—in its foundational governmental documents?

    Egalitarian dispersal of State power is the intended purpose behind the “right to bear arms.”

    The Americans’ egalitarian sentiments expressed in the Second Amendment stem directly from close contact with the egalitarian, power-sharing Non-State eastern woodlands tribes, as documented in anthropologist Jack Weatherford’s Native Roots: How the Indians Enriched America (1992) and Indian Givers: How the Indians of the Americas Transformed the World (1988) and Jame’s Axtell’s The Invasion Within: The Contest of Cultures in Colonial North America (1986) (especially chapter 13, The White Indians of Colonial America.)

    America’s Constitutional Egalitarian Clause is confirmed by biology with how Christopher Boehm describes the evolution of egalitarianism in his Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior (Harvard University Press, 1999) as a “reverse dominance hierarchy,” that depends on the less powerful to band together “to deliberately dominate their potential master if they wish to remain equal.”

    Don't capitulate science--especially evolutionary biology and anthropology--to the Leftists, they're wrong about it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. They are bent on murder.

    "The authorites are well aware of what will be required when it comes to confiscation. I severly doubt any of these guys have the balls to come out firing on a SWAT team. If they do, they’ll be killed by them. Good riddance."

    http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/12/externalities-and-the-dubious-defenses-of-gun-enthusiasts.html#comment-975142

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow! I'm speechless, and yet not surprised by the above post. I can only guess that they relish the thought of most of us being slaughtered in thousands upon thousands of "Ruby Ridge" and/or Waco type incidents.

      Delete
  6. Maybe they plan on nailing us to crosses and displaying us on all the main roads into DC?

    I AM SPARTACUS!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think we've learned our lessons from Waco and Ruby Ridge. Guerilla war, anyone?

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.