It’s unfortunate that Nature's editors were deliberately indifferent to
all of the needed corrections, leaving their readers with wrong
information that could have been easily set straight. And it’s telling
that absent from their coverage of “gun studies” is any acknowledgment
of criminal violence being deterred and lives being saved through
defensive gun uses. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner report exposes illogical assumptions, muddled thinking, carelessness and indifference to the truth where most people would least expect them -- in the scientific literature. What do you expect from people who can't even
accurately quote my blog, and who then address me as "Dr"?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.