Thursday, February 21, 2013
Obama solicits ‘gun violence’ stories
To that end, I’m encouraging Gun Rights Examiner readers to join in the dialog and share your stories of gun defense uses/"gun violence" prevention, or alternatively, to share stories of criminal “gun violence” perpetrated by the “Only Ones” the gun-banners think should be armed, the police and agents of government. [More]This evening's Gun Rights Examiner offering encourages you to engage in some Five-Minute Activism to expose an agenda, set the record straight, and basically poke the commie bedwetters in the eye. Will you help?
Turning Tide?
Dave Workman is reporting support for Alan Gottlieb's background check proposal is outweighing opposition. [Read]
A Progressive Agenda
Punk doesn't like the First Amendment any better than he does the Second. [Read]
Any doubts what this tyrant-in-waiting would do if he didn't have any constraints?
Any doubts what this tyrant-in-waiting would do if he didn't have any constraints?
We're the Only Ones Encouraging Enough
As in "encouraging civilians to take safety into their own hands and take down gunmen who threaten them at work or school." [More]
As in only using their hands against a crazed murderer with a gun.
Say, who are they supposed to be encouraging again?
[Via Mama Liberty]
As in only using their hands against a crazed murderer with a gun.
Say, who are they supposed to be encouraging again?
[Via Mama Liberty]
Two from Congressional Research Service
I've talked about CRS before, and how the reports they prepare on our dime aren't shared with us, but that fortunately, groups like the Federation of American Scientists get copies of the reports and post them on their website.
Carl S. sends us links to two new ones:
I have not had time to go through either. I'm not sure when I'll get time.
Carl S. sends us links to two new ones:
- Federal Assault Weapons Ban: Legal Issues, February 14, 2013
- Exemptions for Firearms in Bankruptcy, February 15, 2013
I have not had time to go through either. I'm not sure when I'll get time.
Patriot veteran and retired Chicago cop tells of freer, safer time
"Our HIGH SCHOOL armory had 50 of these, two Browning Automatic Rifles, five M1 carbines, two .45 cal. semi auto M1911A1 pistols, and one M3 submachine gun,” he continued. “Similar armories were present at even INNER CITY High Schools like Lindbloom, Marshall, Farragutt and most every school that had a junior ROTC, and there was NEVER a school shooting or any one harmed by the presence of these lethal military weapons." [More]Today's Gun Rights Examiner trip down Memory Lane reminds us that the way things are and the way things were can give us clues to the way things ought to be.
The Chicago Way
Obama campaign caught in major NC vote fraud scheme [More]So ... who in a position to do anything about this is going to?
Bueller...?
By Any Other Name
See, if they tell you they're going to rape you from behind, that doesn't sound as inviting as they're going to watch your back and take care of it... [Read]
Isn't that right, Handgun Control, Inc. and Coaltion to Ban Handguns?
Makes perfect "gun sense" to me!
They're incapable of honesty, because that exposes them for what they are. They have to deceive. And they have to use Orwellian terms to do it.
UPDATE: Workman weighs in.
Isn't that right, Handgun Control, Inc. and Coaltion to Ban Handguns?
Makes perfect "gun sense" to me!
They're incapable of honesty, because that exposes them for what they are. They have to deceive. And they have to use Orwellian terms to do it.
UPDATE: Workman weighs in.
A Penetrating Argument
The Party That Supports Rape [Read]What's the big deal? Beckel just agrees with Whoopi.
And with CSGV, who, despite using "white" as a racist pejorative, correctly reminds me I don't speak for all women.
True that, and unlike them, I've never pretended to. Not sharing their affinity for collectivism. my argument is simply that the choice morally belongs to individuals, regardless of sex, melanin levels, or anything else they want to throw out there to help divert attention from the inarguable fact that they would rather see women raped and killed than armed.
I wonder if Bob would like to say something to Amanda or Brianna?
We're the Only Ones with Minor Problems Enough
The alleged victim told police that the 50-year-old Grennier paid her for photographs and video of herself naked and encouraged her to perform sexually explicit acts on the internet. [More]I wonder if this is the guy Jabba the Nadler had in mind when he wrote his new bill?
[Via Harvey]
Problematic?
We do not halt sales to individual officers even in problematic states [More]I have no idea how cop purchases work and if they vary from state-to-state. Do they go directly to the manufacturer after getting department clearance? If they go through FFLs, it would seem simply a matter of not shipping any verboten items to any dealer in that state.
ArmaLite is not winning itself any friends over this, and Pat Raley needs to be called into the head office and reamed. If I'd have responded to a public inquiry that way when I was in sales, I'd have expected to get canned.
[Via Andrea Shea King]
Meanwhile, Across the Pond in Piers Morgan Paradise...
I can’t stop laughing. I think it’s hilarious.’ [More]Some day, the laughter will stop. When it does, I wonder how many will realize that they allowed it to happen, and in many ways, demanded it.
Speaking of Keeping Kids Safe
How would one commit a misdemeanor sex offense against a child? [Read]
I'm thinking maybe if they just attempt something? That still seems pretty damned heinous.
Or maybe teenagers skirting around the age of consent? Kids playing doctor or taking and forwarding stupid pictures?
I'm trying to wrap my head around what is a clear-cut crime and what isn't, and if the former, I'm just not seeing anything less than a felony. If somebody diddles a kid, sorry, they're broke beyond fixing. They can't be trusted without a custodian.
You realize, of course, a few years from now, manipulated public opinion will label me as an intolerant hater and a pedophiliaphobe or some such for believing this way... "top men" are working on that as we speak.
I'm thinking maybe if they just attempt something? That still seems pretty damned heinous.
Or maybe teenagers skirting around the age of consent? Kids playing doctor or taking and forwarding stupid pictures?
I'm trying to wrap my head around what is a clear-cut crime and what isn't, and if the former, I'm just not seeing anything less than a felony. If somebody diddles a kid, sorry, they're broke beyond fixing. They can't be trusted without a custodian.
You realize, of course, a few years from now, manipulated public opinion will label me as an intolerant hater and a pedophiliaphobe or some such for believing this way... "top men" are working on that as we speak.
New Product Idea
UPDATE: Matt Bracken has a graphic of his own.
Somebody's Slipping
Newspaper delivery woman? And no shots were fired? [Read]
On the plus side, the years of indoctrination have paid off. The flower of youth is now scared of everything!
Campaign Finance Reform
Wasn't the object of the whole flap to keep a powerful special interest from being able to use money to unduly influence elections? [Read]
No? It was to keep lots of people from pooling their resources to make their voices heard?
No? It was to keep lots of people from pooling their resources to make their voices heard?
