Friday, June 30, 2017

Not Up for Grabs

“The State of California’s desire to criminalize simple possession of a firearm magazine able to hold more than 10 rounds is precisely the type of policy choice that the Constitution takes off the table,” the injunction read. [More]
I guess having been born in Cuba, Judge Benitez is familiar with the rights-crushing evil that is enabled by "¿Armas para que?" edicts.

1 comment:

  1. TheFakePundit6/30/2017 2:56 PM

    From the order granting the injunction, referencing the passage of Prop 63 "the Constitution is a shield from the tyranny of the majority"

    Seems the Judge has read and understood the Constitution

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.