“The State of California’s desire to criminalize simple possession of a firearm magazine able to hold more than 10 rounds is precisely the type of policy choice that the Constitution takes off the table,” the injunction read. [More]I guess having been born in Cuba, Judge Benitez is familiar with the rights-crushing evil that is enabled by "¿Armas para que?" edicts.
Friday, June 30, 2017
Not Up for Grabs
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
From the order granting the injunction, referencing the passage of Prop 63 "the Constitution is a shield from the tyranny of the majority"
Seems the Judge has read and understood the Constitution
Post a Comment