Thursday, March 22, 2018

We're the Only Ones Arming Enough

Sheriff's officials wrongfully returned a gun to a man who used it to kill his ex-wife inside a busy Southern California mall last weekend, even though a judge had ordered the weapon be confiscated by investigators...[More]
Completely understandable.  He was trusted without a custodian, wasn't he?

1 comment:

  1. “Crane later contacted the California Department of Justice and received a letter saying he was eligible to possess a gun… Crane was legally allowed to purchase a gun — because he wasn’t convicted of a crime — but the sheriff’s department should not have returned the gun that was confiscated, Buschow said."

    So then, a distinction entirely without a difference.

    This article is nonsense, obsessing over absolutely artificial bureaucratic BS.

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.