Years ago I was in that store often. CCW was not on the horizon in Ne. then, but if I had been carrying I would have violated their property rights or not gone in. The thing I would not do is allow their property rights to violate my right to life.
Remember, abuse of rights is when the exercise of yours causes harm to the others. Carrying in a venue such as that with no other action causes them no harm, being killed in their store because of the manner in which they exercise their rights does cause harm and therefore is an abuse of the right and should not be tolerated.
The Von Maur mall shootings is a case in point. Why are they not being held accountable for the harm they abetted? They definitely abused their customers by abusing their rights to the extent that the rights of others and well as their lives were forfeit.
You can falsely yell fire in a crowded theater, but if there is a fire then it is your duty to do so. The first is an abuse of free speech, just as gun free zones are an abuse of the right of people to defend their lives.
I do not understand something here. I see a drawing of a hand gun in the window with a red circle with a red line going through it. There are no words for me to read to understand that they are trying to tell me. It must not be important becaue who looks at the wondow on the exit door side going into the store.
Convenience stores are not called "shoot & scoots" for nothing. But most of the big chains, such as 7-11 are willing to sacrifice their employees and their customers.
Those signs don't mean we should shoot the international symbol for "Prohibited"?
ReplyDeleteThat sign looks likes an updated and lethal version of the "kick me" sign stuck to someone's backside.
ReplyDeleteYears ago I was in that store often. CCW was not on the horizon in Ne. then, but if I had been carrying I would have violated their property rights or not gone in. The thing I would not do is allow their property rights to violate my right to life.
ReplyDeleteRemember, abuse of rights is when the exercise of yours causes harm to the others. Carrying in a venue such as that with no other action causes them no harm, being killed in their store because of the manner in which they exercise their rights does cause harm and therefore is an abuse of the right and should not be tolerated.
The Von Maur mall shootings is a case in point. Why are they not being held accountable for the harm they abetted? They definitely abused their customers by abusing their rights to the extent that the rights of others and well as their lives were forfeit.
You can falsely yell fire in a crowded theater, but if there is a fire then it is your duty to do so. The first is an abuse of free speech, just as gun free zones are an abuse of the right of people to defend their lives.
you CANNOT falsely yell fire... it should have read.
ReplyDeleteI do not understand something here. I see a drawing of a hand gun in the window with a red circle with a red line going through it. There are no words for me to read to understand that they are trying to tell me.
ReplyDeleteIt must not be important becaue who looks at the wondow on the exit door side going into the store.
Convenience stores are not called "shoot & scoots" for nothing. But most of the big chains, such as 7-11 are willing to sacrifice their employees and their customers.
ReplyDelete