A government scheme offering fast-tracked gun permits to men who agree to undergo a vasectomy is being criticised by the men who say officials are reneging on the deal. [More]And that surprises anyone why...?
Talk about a story rich in metaphor.
[Via Long Island Mike]
How come whenever someone attempts to engage in practical social engineering, he is not capable of producing logic beyond that of a kindergartner's intellect? (This probably explains why the self-styled elite address us like children.)
ReplyDeleteHistorical examples:
A concealed weapon always indicates criminal activity;
later;
an openly displayed weapon always indicates criminal activity.
Perhaps the men should wear their testes on the outside until such time as that is too made illegal.
This gives me an idea that might just work with the next liberal gun grab. The libs can turn in their guns and get a free vasectomy!
ReplyDeleteFor God's sake, why Bob? Their uh, um, er....equipment is already non-functional, probably their guns are too.
ReplyDeleteI'm here for my vasectomy and gun permit, and also for my $10 million for letting the pasha use my bank account to move billion$ to the States before the Pakis seize it.
ReplyDeleteWhere is everybody?
As late as the 1960s, the government of Virginia (some of the same people are still in the bureaucracy) mandated sterilization of the mentally retarded. Who was "retarded"? Whoever they said. Uneducated people such as rural blacks deprived of schools to go to. The dyslexic. People who objected to the program.
The mentality is still here. That was not so long ago. SOME people are more spophisticated now, but see link #1 today. Many would cheer. There's more than one way to eliminate the opposition. Miseducation, sterilization, liquidation. Same thing, different velocities.
Either way, they are cutting you off at the testes.
ReplyDelete