ATF Expands Snitch ‘Service’ with Anonymous App

Even they can’t track who we are, ATF pledges, and therein lies another danger (feature?) of anonymous snitch programs. [More]

Gosh, who could have foreseen unintended consequences and opportunities for abuse from a government system designed to attract snitches?

We're the Only Ones Getting a Leg Up on the Situation Enough

He said a federal law enforcement officer who was responding to the incident was shot in the leg when another officer's gun accidentally discharged. [More]

What an incompetent gun!

Thank God the trained professionals showed up to take charge of things!

[Via Geordan]

A Wedding Cake Baker's Dozen

More than a dozen gun control supporters took part in a protest on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. [More]

Damn -- with support like that, where do I go to give up?

Black Lies Matter

But ... but ... but ... that would mean "progressives" think of them as their political chattel, to be manipulated and used and even killed if that's what it takes...

[Via Florida Guy] 

Bishops Evidently Prefer to be Pawns

John Snyder points out a profound hypocrisy. [More]

Obama Nomination of Qureshi to DC Court to Test Senate Republicans

To those who say what a nominee strongly believes shouldn’t matter, such attitudes typically come from secular viewpoints, or from those who haven’t thought things through completely and with consistency.  Or from those with an agenda. [More]

It's a big club and you ain't in it.  So if the Article VI prohibition against religious tests renders the Muslim point moot, what else could the Senate be looking at?

And Best of All, No Questions Asked

I don't imagine one would be too hard to build at all, and for only a few dollars to buy some pipe and stuff. [More]

You wouldn't even have to (or probably want to) fire it as long as it fit the definition of a firearm.  The point here is bang for the buck (with care to make sure you don't get popped on some state infringement).

[Via Florida Guy]  

Heartland, Here We Come!

What could go wrong? [More]

[Via Florida Guy]   

Speaking of SPLC's 'Hate Watch'

While over there grabbing a link for my last post, I saw they just couldn't resist one last attack on Phyllis Schlafly, and a repetition of their trademark lie that proponents of the Constitution are "anti-government." [More] 

If you want to see true hate, look at some of the comments from the sick f***s rejoicing in her death.  This one in particular caught my eye, captured in a screenshot in case it's removed:

[Click to enlarge]

He says he wants to recruit people to join him in bombing her funeral procession?  If the Eagle Forum site allowed such a comment to first get in and then remain posted, you can be sure the Prozis would jump on it.

It's a joke, right?  Can you be sure? I mean, the guy who posted that also identifies himself as @ReyMohammed and, and he's the one who publicly implied a bomb threat.

In the spirit of "If you see something, say something," I think that determination should be made by the professionals.

UPDATE: Proof the hate accusers at SPLC approved that comment:

[Click to enlarge]

UPDATE: And Moe ain't done with his SPLC-approved death wishes:

[Click to enlarge]

A Test of Character

The Louisiana chapter of Oath Keepers is coordinating with the Cajun Army to assist in recovery efforts. [More]

Here's how to help.

Funny, I don't see SPLC doing anything...

Besides trying to conflate Oath Keepers with "haters"...

Cry Havoc!

And let slip the chairs of war. [More]

[Via Steve T] 

Two Questions

How does allowing those who hate us into the country "secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity"? [More]

Whose interests are served by allowing them to remain, and by continuing to sustain them?

Nothing to See Here

Evidently, some are OK with excusing special treatment the rest of us wouldn't get had we left the scene of an accident, given conflicting statements to police, and proven to  be a hazard to others. More than OK-- they're bending over backwards to speculate on mitigating circumstances or blame the other party, which they have no way of knowing about. [More]

That's the point of trials.

I guess when this comes to testimony, we should ignore the important oath he broke and give him the benefit of the doubt on the new oath he will take before repeating what his lawyer coached him to say  -- just like he did in the statement released to the media.

'In a Way, We're Just a Welcoming Crew'

Special Report: Border crisis reality check  [Watch]

Put into perspective by a friend who notes:

Note the Border Patrol Council whining about not having enough agents. What's the point of hiring more agents, when the agents we already have are letting 90% of the invaders go -- in the USA?

The problem isn't too few agents. The problem is subversion by the president. You could have 1 million agents and it wouldn't solve the problem, not until you hold the president accountable or replace him with someone who isn't a traitor.

Dear God, can't anyone think?