Friday, November 30, 2007

Suffredin Succotash!

"I am tired of business as usual. I am tired of picking up the paper or turning on the news to see reports about innocent children gunned down in cold blood, because some gang member bought a gun at their local gun shop," Suffredin said. "For nearly thirty years, I have fought for sensible gun laws. Whether it was against the NRA or legislative leaders, I fought to pass laws to keep guns off our streets."

Doing Snuffy's dirty work for him, Larry? And if John R-I-G-G-I-O doesn't shut down Chuck's Gun Shop, are you going to have your "Only Ones" snuff him out?

There can be no peace with these evil creatures--they will not allow it. They insist on pushing and pushing and leaving no choice but to obey or be destroyed. How much longer people who consider themselves free will put up with their undisguised tyranny remains to be seen. In short, Larry, when are people going to get tired of you?

And incidentally--to the Reuters "Authorized Journalist" headline writers--I was going to correct you and say the word is "Reined," but now that I've read the article, I see spelling it with a "g" is more appropriate.

[UPDATE: I see Mikestraw1 and KABA beat me to two punches...]

We're the Only Ones Interrogating Enough

Four city police officers were suspended without pay for allowing a homicide suspect to smuggle a loaded gun into police headquarters by hiding it inside her underwear.
So...gRendell...based on results, Pennsylvania's "Only Ones" can't even keep guns out of their holding cells--and you're pushing the fraud that you can control them throughout the entire state?

The Mass Shooter Loophole

States appear to be taking more action to keep guns out of the hands of people with mental health problems in the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings, new figures show. [More]
The rejects suspected of being maniacs with murder in their evil hearts will, however, still have full unrestricted access to utility knives, fuel oil and fertilizer, and gasoline and matches, as well as be allowed to move freely throughout society. [Via Plug Nickel Times]

We're the Only Ones Shirking Enough

Male police slept on the job, faked patrol reports, watched an X-rated TV channel and ran a forfeit system where they had to buy each other doughnuts as a penalty for leaving guns lying around, an employment tribunal heard.

Cryptic Subterranean treats us to a sordid tale of airport "Only Ones" on his side of the pond.

More on State AGs

Yesterday, we discussed finding out where our state attorneys general stand on the Heller case, and if they will file an amicus brief on its behalf.

Correspondent GarandFan did some stats legwork for us in his comments.

1894C points us to this essay by Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox.

David Hardy tells me Texas Solicitor General R. Ted Cruz "is rounding up AG amici," and reports the Arkansas AG Dustin McDaniel is filing one.


I'm toying with the idea of putting together one of those maps of the US where the states are color coded to show who's on board, who's AWOL and who's against us--here's the preliminary rough draft:


At this point, it only shows those that have actually filed at the SCOTUS level per the above-referenced comments, which I have not double-checked--point being, this is a rough draft only intended to express the concept. Maybe I should also add a symbol for those states that filed a brief at the district level, and another if they signed on to the Ashcroft support letter...

Of course, if somebody with actual graphics skills and the ability to create an interactive map where you could click on states and symbols and link to copies of the briefs, etc., wanted to take this project over, I wouldn't mind stepping out of the way one bit.

Sweet Homegrown Terrorist Alabama

Anti-government groups usually believe:
Gun Control = Enslavement
Constitution has been subverted
The U.S. has lost its sovereignty

And your point would be...?

Garrett has more on "Homegrown Terrorists"...

Nice to know the people of the state of Alabama are paying for this...I tried taking their quiz and when I completed it got a "data retrieval failure" notice--there's government in action for ya.

Maybe what we need to do is come up with one of those quizzes of our own on this--where you get the code for a graphic you can put on your website that shows what level you came in at...

Here's the Humor Paul: You're Making a Prissy Little Fool of Yourself (Again)

In last night’s Republican YouTube debate, a questioner submitted this video of himself shooting what looks like an AK-type semi-automatic assault rifle at a target in the desert. In less than two seconds, self-identified NRA Life Member Jay Fox fires off six rounds. (Check the timing of the video yourself.)

Oooh...six rounds in less than two seconds. Check the timing yourself...

Good grief. You really don't have the first idea what you're talking about, do you?

Here's a clue as to why that's no big deal, Paul.

No wonder you're so afraid--you're ignorant.

No wonder you some off like such an hysterical little girl--instead of a man.

This Day in History: November 30

The Treaty of Paris ended the Revolutionary War between Great Britain and the United States, recognized American independence and established borders for the new nation. After the British defeat at Yorktown, peace talks in Paris began in April 1782 between Richard Oswarld representing Great Britain and the American Peace Commissioners Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, and John Adams. The American negotiators were joined by Henry Laurens two days before the preliminary articles of peace were signed on November 30, 1782.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

A Larmee of One

I really assumed this was done by a child, and not a very smart or talented one at that.

To paraphrase the old saying, I don't know art, but I know what sucks.

Paul Helmke's New Math

There is the “Militia purpose” clause, with 13 words. Then there is the “keep and bear Arms” clause, with 14 words. Two clauses and 27 words. This is an uncomfortable fact to those accustomed to reading only half of the Amendment, reciting the last 14 words over and over again as if the first 13 didn’t exist.

Of course they all exist, Paul. You're the ones arguing the militia are not "the whole people," but just that fraction in active service to the government.

By the way, how come no comments on your blog, Paul? What are you afraid of? I guess your supporters will have to troll "pro-gun" sites to chime in their support for your subversive lies.

UPDATE: Hi guys. That's right, I said "LIES." Speaking of which, how come your IP Address still says "Handgun Control"?


I thought you'd established the deception that you were some sort of violence prevention campaign, because the old monicker revealed too much about your mindset and goals...

Do You Know Where YOUR AG Stands?

Ryan Horsley asks his to weigh in on Heller with support for individual rights.

I'm delighted to see this avenue being pursued. A few days back, I sent the following link of state Attorneys General supporting the Ashcroft position to Robert Levy, hoping he would find value in it, and he noted that "6 of the 18 [were] Democrats...very impressive..."

I wasn't so fortunate in the response I received from then-CA AG Bill Lockyer, which was really no surprise, but did get a commitment from Republican AG candidate Dick Ackerman's campaign that he would go on record supporting an individual rights view.

I agree with Ryan--find out where your state AG stands on the Second Amendment--and ask him if he will add his voice to those supporting Heller.

A Word About Registration

Today's post on Ontario home inspections illustrates one of the reasons I get so irritated with some in Second Amendment academic circles who maintain that registration would prove to be Constitutional, citing militia laws specifying firearm and inspection requirements. There's no argument that those mustered were required to submit to command authority in this and other matters--but also no evidence that this universally included a thorough accounting of everything that they did not bring to the field and left for private use at home.

I don't know why these reputed smart guys think it's wise to cede this point before we've even engaged on it, and particularly with the indisputable historical record of government abuse whenever such lists are at their disposal.

ALERT in Ontario

We have just learned that the Chief Firearms Office in Ontario is initiating a pilot program to begin limited home inspections in the Toronto area.

CSSA Executive Director Larry Whitmore sent me this link to legal information they have made available to those at risk.

Think about it. Mandatory inspections. Warrantless searches. A requirement to self-incriminate. Presumed authority to seize property. All against registered collectors under the guise of "public safety," with a liberal sprinkling of the word "reasonable," and even sneaking in the Orwellian fraud of "voluntary compliance."

That'll show Ontario's violent criminal underclass.

Keep an eye on this one for adaptation here. You know our enemies will.

[Via Bruce Mills]

We're the Only Ones Who Really Know How to Party Enough

Jude, 29, said he had been at a party on Oct. 24, 2004, when a group of white men who identified themselves as off-duty officers kicked and punched him, put a knife to his throat and jammed a pen in his ears as he begged for mercy. Jude said he heard Spengler call him a racial slur.
Thank goodness it's only a few "Only Ones," right, and it's not reflective of the force? That must be why:
The police department disciplined 13 officers after the beating, including nine who were fired. Two of the fired officers won back their jobs, including Packard after a 20-day suspension.

Four others have pleaded guilty to similar federal charges.
Nope, no pattern here...

[Via SameNoKami]

We're the Only Ones Misconducting Ourselves Enough

Prosecutors said Trooper Robert Czora pulled over an out-of-state motorist on the Adirondack Northway in Ausable back in August. He told the motorist to pay $300 in bail money then kept the money for himself.
But he didn't plan on keeping the money, as evidenced by the fact that he returned it after finding out he was being investigated! Why does that remind me of something a 7-year-old would say when caught with his hand in the cookie jar?

Forget not knowing if this highwayman is going to keep his job--why isn't he being prosecuted for strong arm robbery with additional charges tacked on because a gun was on his person during a commission of a crime?

And can you imagine what he would have done had she refused to sign the ticket? Or offered an opinion? Or "lifted a finger" to stop a literal act of highway robbery under color of authority?

Only "The Only Ones"...

We're the Only Ones Flying Free Enough

Stan tells us of one story with two outcomes.

WarOnGuns mentioned Judge James here and here. I also told you about High-Flyin' Frank and the Juan that got away, The story of the hapless Mr. Hochman only proves it's good to be an "Only One."

Follow the title link and find out what happens if you're not.

GunTalk TV

It's not really a surprise that CNN chose to not air the Tom Gresham/Clint Smith question--anyone who watched the "debates" saw they did present two RKBA-related questions, one where the person had to be corrected not to throw guns, the other where the questioner--and Rudy--repeated the oblivious assumption that 2A is a granted right.

Tom didn't figure they'd select his question, but was nice enough not to discourage me from urging gun owners to request CNN do just that. He's been busy bypassing a media that too often ignores gun owners by producing his own videos at GunTalkTV, and tells me:
A bunch are free. Some require a (cheap) subscription...It's been fun, and it's going to grow like crazy. We kicked it off with 100 videos, but I plan to have 500 on it within a year. All are original (I shoot 'em) videos. We'll be adding some with Jerry Miculek next week. The safety videos are all free. Folks do need to sign up to see them...

Anyway, take a look. My goal is to make quality firearms training available to everyone.
By all means, take a look.

UPDATE: Faulty memory alert. There were three questions, actually--the third dealt with guns candidates own and if any require a stamp.

This Day in History: November 29

The officers commanding regiments are to see, that their men's arms are put in the best order possible; and of the loaded ones, such as can be drawn, are to be drawn, and the others discharged the first fair day, at eleven o'clock in the forenoon; but to prevent the waste of lead, the men of each regiment, or brigade, are to discharge their pieces, into a bank of earth, from whence the lead may be taken again.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Late Start

Computer has been down all morning. Finally have it back up, but posting has been shot to hell.

Here's an outline of what I was going to talk about today, sans commentary:

This Day in History
After the judgement and loyalty of Silas Deane is called into question, Congress appoints John Adams to succeed Deane as the commissioner to France.

We're the Only Ones Who Won't Be Charged Enough
Charges will not be filed against a district court judge who was accused of taking a loaded gun to a Detroit Metropolitan Airport checkpoint this summer.
[Via MacEntyre]
Whose Right to Bear Arms?

Some questions are best left to time, precedent and the evolving standards of the common law.
[Via Paul W. Davis]

The ABC's of Assault Weapons
This surge of deaths stemming from semiautomatic assault weapons seems unnecessary. In 1994, President Clinton signed a law banning the sale of these weapons.
[Via HZ]

Is Paris Burning?

Youths rampaged for a third night in the tough suburbs north of Paris and violence spread to a southern city late Tuesday as police struggled to contain rioters who have burned cars and buildings and — in an ominous turn — shot at officers.
[Via Chris Horton]

Reminder-Republican YouTube Debate is Tonight! There is still time to email CNN about the Gresham tape.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

What Passes for a Legal Scholar

But there is no need for the court to choose, because even if the Second Amendment is regarded as creating an individual right to own firearms, it is surely not an absolute liberty. It seems obvious that the government can keep people from having particularly dangerous weapons, such as assault rifles, and keep those with criminal records from having guns. Just as free speech has never been regarded as absolute, nor should an individual right to bear arms be seen as precluding all government regulation.
No one is arguing that the Second Amendment CREATES any right, Erwin, except for you lying left-wing revisionist subversives trying to derail it with weasel words and deception. In Madison's own words, he was "enumerating particular exceptions to the grant of power." Your First Amendment analogy also falls flat because it does not invoke prior restraint. And the purpose of government is to protect rights and property, not control them.

This is what passes for a professor of law these days? Good grief. I wouldn't use your articles to line my birdcage--they might contaminate the guano.

So Who's the Liar?

I am sorry that you were offended by the“yahoo” comment; it actually referred to persons who shouted “yahoo” after common sense gun legislation was defeated within the judiciary committee.
Really?

Because the "Authorized Journalist" told us that Jewell said "Yahoos" were "the old boys with the boots and the guns."

On the one hand, Jewell says "I am a strong supporter of the right to bear arms" while shilling for the police state, so we know right off the bat he's talking out of both sides of his mouth. On the other hand, well, we're dealing with an anti-gun Philly opinion columnist here.

A politician or a big city media hack. Which one is lying? Talk about a real stumper!

Was anybody at the legislative committee meeting? Is there a recording of the event? Did someone really yell "Yahoo"? And did Jewell really make that remark to the "reporter"?

Some of us "Yahoos," code word for redneck, code word for rural white hick as used here, would like to know if we've been disparaged with a racist character slur by an elected representative of the people. And interestingly, the origin of the word as an interjection is a variation of "Yo-Ho," but noting the circumstances of this dispute we probably shouldn't go there.

To Dream the Impossible Dream

That demand for perfection is an impossible burden for anyone, including federal firearms licensees, to meet. If ATF continues to enforce the law in the current manner, few licensees will remain in business.
Ryan Horsley shares the thoughts of his attorney on BATFU's impossible dream--which turns out to be a nightmare for the rest of us.

Sean Taylor: Death By Gun Control?

Taylor and his fiancee had been in the bedroom when a disturbance was heard in the living room, Sharpstein said.

"(He) tried to get a small machete that he keeps under the bed to defend himself but the door was burst into," Sharpstein told CNN, adding that Taylor's fiancee hid under the covers until the assailants had fled.
Why a machete?

Taylor had faced off-field legal issues several times, including a 2004 drunken driving arrest and the dropping of felony assault charges from a 2005 off-season incident involving firearms.

Taylor... pleaded no contest last year to two misdemeanor charges in connection with the 2005 incident and was in the final days of 18 months on probation.

Typically, people on probation are prohibited from possessing firearms. But then again, his assailant probably was, too. But the fact that he was not in custody means the legal system did not deem him a danger to others. The fact that he was a big, strong guy with access to machetes, and other potentially lethal objects just makes the firearm prohibition even more absurd. And the fact that a big, strong guy with a machete was no match for someone with a gun ought to be an object lesson for anyone who would find themselves outmatched without one.

I repeat myself: Those who cannot be trusted with firearms cannot be trusted without a custodian.

I also won't be surprised to find out there's a lot more to this story than what we've heard so far.

[Via John Hardin]


UPDATE: A comment poster on Reason Hit & Run writes:
A radio show interviewed Taylor's attorney from that case. He said that there were no restrictions on that, and that Taylor was no longer under any probation, anyway.
I'm taking that under advisement, but still maintain the speculation is valid to bring up, not only because diverse news sources claim Taylor's probation had not yet ended (his plea deal was first reported in June 2006, meaning he'd still have a couple months left to reach 18 months), but also because Florida statute 948.03 on terms and conditions of probation state that the offender:
Be prohibited from possessing, carrying, or owning any firearm unless authorized by the court and consented to by the probation officer.
Obviously, the important thing is to determine the truth of the matter, and the truth remains, regardless of Taylor's probation status and imposed conditions, his not having a firearm gave the victory advantage to his assailant.

Naturally, I'll keep an eye open if more information surfaces.

Speaking of Calendars...

...there is one more day to send that email to CNN and ask them to play the Tom Gresham/Clint Smith gun law repeal question on the Republican YouTube debate, Wed., Nov. 28, 8:00 PM EST.

It'd sure be nice to think that gun owners would take a minute out of their lives to do this, and maybe take another minute to spread the word.

Mark Your Calendar...


...right after you get one. Chris Horton has more info on those gun calendars being sold to raise funds for Maryland volunteer fire departments, including a link to order them.

The Monster Maker


Oh just stop it. Good Lord, what the hell is wrong with some people? They truly are too stupid, dependent and pathetic to be anything other than wards of a police state. I nominate comment poster "kl" for the "If You're Happy and You Know It Clank Your Chains" award.

The issue we advocating Liberty have not addressed in any great detail is those in our culture who have become so degraded they are unprepared for even the most basic responsibilities of free people. I fear if things get really bad, and they can no longer rely on their keepers, they will suffer the most, and in the greatest numbers. And that's what's truly monstrous.

[Via HZ]

We're the Only Ones Suspended Enough

A Channel 3 Eyewitness News investigation has led to the suspension of a Teton County deputy accused of shooting a dog.

Deputy Joseph Gutierrez has been suspended and the Tri-county Sheriff's organization is now investigating the shooting incident...

When we spoke with Teton County dispatch, they say they've received multiple death threats against their officers.
Gee, imagine that. Consequences for actions.

Does this mean there's a limit to what people will put up with from "Only Ones" before they start reacting in the same manner in which they are treated?

This Day in History: November 27

By order of Genl. Howe, 300 of the poor Inhabitants of Boston were landed on Saturday last at point Shirley, destitute almost of every thing; the Instant I got notice of it, I informed a Committee of Council thereof, that proper care might be taken of them -- Yesterday in the evening I receive information that one of them was dead, and two more expiring; and the whole in the most miserable and piteous condition. -- I have order'd Provision to them till they can be remov'd, but am under dreadful apprehensions of their communicating the small Pox as it is Rief in Boston. I have forbid any of them coming to this place on that acct.

Monday, November 26, 2007

IMPORTANT REMINDER...

...about this video by Tom Gresham and Clint Smith, where they ask the Republican presidential candidates which "gun control" laws they would work to repeal.

You'll recall WarOnGuns urged gun owners to contact CNN and press them to include this question in the upcoming YouTube debate, Wed., Nov. 28, 8:00 PM EST.

What say we give them a last-minute surge and let them know there is strong interest in getting this question aired and answered?

[Thanks for the reminder to D.W. Lawson]

Vigilance

The Vigilant Hose, Myersville, Brunswick and Jefferson volunteer fire companies are selling 2008 Sportsman's Calendars, which offer a chance at winning either money or a gun every day of 2008.

These are my kind of first responders. It's nice for an outsider to realize Maryland's not all like Baltimore.

"The Yahoos Win Again"

The third measure was withdrawn after the first two were voted down. Its chief sponsor, Rep. Jewell Williams, D-Philly, said, "The yahoos win again.

"The yahoos? "Yeah," he says, "the old boys with the boots and the guns."

Thanks, Jewell. That wouldn't be a code word for "white," would it?

You've removed all doubt as to what this is all about--using force of law to impose your evil prejudices. You've certainly relieved us of any obligation to be civil in our communications with you. But tell me: how many "Yahoos" committed "gun murders" in your district over the past year--as opposed to your constituents?

And hasn't gRendell stopped howling in mad pain yet?

Academics for the Second Amendment Want YOU

Preparing and filing the amicus brief will take thousands of additional dollars. A2A will be facing attorney fees, printing expenses, filing fees, travel and lodging expenses, etc. We have some money but not enough.

Follow the title link to find out how you can help support the important and historic Heller effort. Please don't sit on the sidelines on this one.

R-E-S-P-E-C-T

We should be able to combine respect for those traditions with our concern for kids who are being shot down. This is a classic example of us just applying some common sense, just being reasonable, right? And reasonable would say that lawful gun owners – I respect the Second Amendment. I think lawful gun owners should be able to hunt, be sportsmen, protect their families.
Why is it when Obama says "repect" in this context, I hear backup singers going:
Sock it to me
Sock it to me
Sock it to me
Sock it to me...?

Meanwhile, Over in Brady Paradise

Japan's parliament on Monday passed legislation strengthening gun control following a spate of shootings by gangsters, including the assassination of a city mayor in April and the recent murder of a hospital patient in a case of mistaken identity.
They're making everything even more illegal.

Easy Access to Pipes Cited in SA Suicide

A 22-year-old KwaZulu-Natal man built a home-made firearm at the weekend and used the weapon to kill himself, police said on Monday.
Where there's a will there's a way, and no "law" will ever change that.

We're the Only Ones Claiming Our Inheritance Enough

An arsenal of weapons, including assault rifles and artillery shells, was secretly seized three years ago from the home of a deceased former Albany police official who had helped dozens of officers illegally purchase machine guns in the mid-1990s.
Well, gee. No wonder they're trying so hard to keep this a secret.

But fear not. David Soares is on the job. To make sure non-"Only Ones" don't have any "illegal guns."

[Via cbar10]

We're the Only Ones Well-Muscled Enough

After the matter was resolved Parfrey said the RCMP shift supervisor, a “very big, well-muscled man”, told him he didn’t like the way his officers had been treated and said if he had been the one to stop them things would have gone worse. Parfrey took exception to what he saw as intimidation by the supervisor.

Kassen thought the officer was threatening and said, “I had the feeling his superior overruled him and that he might be feeling vindictive.” He remains concerned that there may be negative consequences for the duo for standing up for their rights.
Apparently, if you're an "Only One," ignorance of the law is an excuse--to continue being an abusive, law-breaking (and apparently head-breaking) thug. Too bad they didn't publish the muscle-head's name.

[Via Brian T]

"Most Dangerous and Vile"

FOREWORD: I have not personally verified the following text. It was sent to me by correspondent "Don," who tells me "You need to go to the Arizona Room at the main library and ask for the book of the Arizona Constitutional Convention of 1910. See pgs 678,679....the minutes are all there."
The Records of the Arizona Constitutional Convention of 1910
Pages 678 and 679 Edited by: John S. Goff (C) The Supreme Court of Arizona

Mr. Chairman: Are there any objections or corrections to Section 32?

Mr. Baker: Mr. Chairman, I move to strike out all of Section 32. I never in all my life found it necessary to carry a six-shooter and I have passed through nearly all the scenes and experiences of this world and unsettled country. Carrying arms is dangerous. It is a very dangerous thing to oneself and to one's associates and should not be permitted under any circumstances. I have seen lives lost and innocent blood spilled just through the carrying of arms, concealed weapons under one's coat or shirt. It is most dangerous and vile; a practice that should never be permitted except in times of war and never in times of peace. Think of it; carrying a six-shooter or a knife or some other terrible arm of defense, and then in a moment of heated passion using that weapon. I do not believe in it and I move to strike out that section.

Mr.Webb: I second that motion for I agree with the gentleman from Maricopa that it is a pernicious thing and should not be included in this bill. I too, in all my experiences, have never seen the time when it was necessary to carry concealed weapons except in times of Indian troubles, and have had many and varied experiences, in cow camps. I have been in many places where some might deem it necessary to come armed, but I did not, nor do I believe it necessary to do so now. We are no longer a frontier country, and if we did not need arms in the early days of pioneering in this country, we do not now, and I second the motion.

Mr. Crutchfield: I move to amend by inserting after the word "impair" in line 9, page 7, the following words: "....but the legislature shall have the right to regulate the wearing of weapons to prevent crime."

Mr. Baker: That is all right and I second the motion.

Mr. Parsons: Mr. chairman, I move to amend by striking out all of Section 32 and substituting the following in lieu thereof:, "The people shall have the right to bear arms for their safety and defense, but the legislature shall regulate the exercise of this right by law."

Mr. Feeney: I second that motion.

Mr. Chairman: The question comes up on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Cochise, Mr. Parsons, to strike out Section 32 and insert in lieu thereof his amendment. Those in favor of this motion answer "aye", opposed "nay". The motion is lost. The question now comes up on the amendment offered by Mr. Crutchfield to insert after the word "impaired" in line 9, page 7, the following words: " but the legislature shall have the right to regulate the wearing of weapons to prevent crime." Those in favor of the amendment say "aye", those opposed "nay". The secretary will call the roll.

Roll Call showed: 22 "Ayes" 23 "Nays".

Mr. Chairman: The motion is lost, and Section 32 will stand approved as read unless there are other amendments. Are there any objections to Section 33?

[ 25 November, Evening ]

SECTION 32: The right of the individual citizens to bear arms in defense of himself or the state shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.

[ Later renumbered: Article II, Section 26, Arizona Constitution ]

This Day in History: November 26

My opinion is, to draw our whole force together, take post and fortify Germantown, considering it as our Winter Quarters. When the works there are in a tolerable state of defence, I should be for taking our whole force (except one Brigade to guard the works) and proceed [struck: as] near the enemies lines, offering them battle, which, if they declined, would in the opinion of every national man, fully evince our superiority in point of strength. If they should come out, fight, and defeat us, we have a secure retreat and Winter Quarters.

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Securing the Blessings of Liberty in Washington

Federal officials are routinely asking courts to order cellphone companies to furnish real-time tracking data so they can pinpoint the whereabouts of drug traffickers, fugitives and other criminal suspects, according to judges and industry lawyers.

In some cases, judges have granted the requests without requiring the government to demonstrate that there is probable cause to believe that a crime is taking place or that the inquiry will yield evidence of a crime.
Oh, now, come on. I'm sure they need this tool to help track Homegrown Terrorists.

[Via AvgJoe]

Burma Shave IX



Previous "Burma Shave" Signs:
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII

[For those not familiar with the Burma Shave roadside billboard campaign or the CCRA RKBA campaign]

Easy Access

FOREWORD: This little essay, which I wrote in 2001, has disappeared from other sites where it originally appeared, so I'm going to give it a home here at WarOnGuns:

Half a lifetime ago, my friend Howard's dad bought him a Stevens bolt-action, single-shot .22 with a Weaver 4X scope. By the time he was 13, his dad trusted him enough to take the gun by himself to the range in Santa Monica. The rest of the world didn't have a problem with it either.

Stevens rifle in hand, he and a friend walked down the street and boarded a bus, opening the action to show the driver that the gun wasn't loaded. After getting off at their stop, they walked another half-mile to the range. And they returned home the same way.

Fast-forward to the present. The place is Hawthorne, California, the scene, the 99 Cents Plus Mini Market. Two predatory teenagers have decided the store is a low-risk target, with vulnerable prey. This is the third robbery at the place in two months. It's not as if the cops are around. And when you're an easy mark, word spreads on the street.

Still, there is nothing like an overwhelming show of force, just to make sure your victims know who's in charge, and violent criminals always seem to understand this. To that end, one approaches a 62-year-old female clerk and sticks a gun to her head, a machine pistol according to the news accounts.

Another gun crime committed by troubled adolescents. Isn't this further proof that youth today have all too easy access to guns, and that if we don't do something about it, the senseless killings will continue?

Let's stop for a moment and examine the facts. In California, a juvenile cannot legally own a gun. He cannot legally handle one outside the supervision of an adult. He cannot legally carry a concealed weapon, nor can that weapon be loaded, even if carried openly, which he's not allowed to do. So at this point, we have several violations of state gun control laws, each enacted under the promise that it will help end this sort of thing. And, as automatic weapons have been regulated, licensed and taxed by the federal government since 1934, illegal possession of a machine pistol makes this a federal rap as well.

Like any of this matters to any but opportunistic politicians and those incapable of separating reason from emotion who elect them. Street hoodlums are smarter than that. They know they can get a gun any time they want. They laugh at anyone who thinks that another law is going to slow them down one bit, as if someone who would commit armed robbery and assault with a deadly weapon by sticking a machine pistol to a 62-year-old woman's head would worry about the penalties for violating one of the 20,000-plus gun control laws already in place. No?

But let's return to the 99 Cents Plus store and see what harvest easy youth access to guns has reaped. There is a struggle. The woman's 12-year-old grandson grabs a hidden handgun and fires at one of the attackers, killing him and causing his accomplice to flee.

He has repelled two monsters, this brave youth, most certainly saving his grandmother, and probably himself, as murderers tend not to look upon witnesses with favor. He has stopped a violent crime from happening and assured that at least one sociopathic reptile will never again find human victims.

So where are the headlines: RESPONSIBLE ARMED YOUTH SAVES LIVES...? I mean, the press is supposed to be objective and unbiased, right?

Do you think the scenario may have played out differently had the wonks at Handgun Control, Inc., been heeded? What do you think the outcome would have been had the grandmother kept her gun unloaded, locked up and separated from its ammunition, or if she had installed a trigger lock? What about if her firearm was a personalized "smart gun" that no one but herself could fire? And had these "safety methods" resulted in the death of this valiant boy and his grandmother, would HCI have exploited this to call for yet more gun control?

Half a lifetime ago, a boy carrying a scoped rifle boarded the Santa Monica bus and no one gave it a second thought. There can be no doubt what the result would be if he tried the same thing today, in our climate of "easy youth access to guns."

Just a Gun

[Use BugMeNot to bypass site registration]
After one outdoors writer saw his career ruined when he said he saw no place for "black" rifles in hunting, this writer wanted to use such a rifle for hunting himself.
True, it ain't about hunting, but otherrwise, Dennis Anderson does a good job setting the record straight. About the only thing I'd add--and his readers should know about this--is how the term "assault weapon" was an intentionally deceptive term employed to exploit public ignorance. We all deserve to know when we're being lied to, and who those liars are.

We're the Only Ones "No Show" Enough

Despite a court order, a police detective has repeatedly failed to show up to give a deposition in a Brooklyn man’s lawsuit charging police brutality. Now the city says the detective has retired and cannot be found, an explanation that has failed to satisfy the judge overseeing the case...

The detective accused of beating Mr. Victor, Dwayne L. Chandler, has missed five appointments to give his own sworn account of the case.
All I can say, Mr. Victor, is you're lucky you didn't "lift a finger" against him.

D'ya think former "Only One" Chandler still carries a gun...?

[Via Peter R]

Let's Do a Warrrantless Gun Search on YOU, Jeanine

HZ sends us a link to Jeanine Pirro demonstrating how a Republican fascist can be just as loathsome (if not more) as those with "D's" after their names.

If she's so into warrantless searches, I have one for her--or hell--get a warrant--I insist:

"I have a .22, a .38 and a Mauser," she bragged to the annual New York Conservative Party conference in a shameless pandering session to lie about her record and whore for votes.

OK, Jeanine, since we the little people apparently have nothing to hide, where do you keep them? Because as we all know, your husband is a convicted felon, and he can't have access to firearms--which again, for we the little people generally means living in a place where they are present.

For someone who enthusiastically put convicted felons in prison over firearms possession violations, I'm wondering why the double standard, Jeanine--and how it is we ever got to the point where our ruling elites can flout laws they impose on the rest of us with impunity.

If New York law enforcement had a shred of integrity, they'd investigate and prosecute--they do in the poor community based on less reliable tips than a person's own words quoted in a major newspaper. And if this...woman had a shred of decency, she'd go crawl in a cave somewhere in shame instead of flaunting her status as exhibitionist for the police state.

Me and My 30'06

Joe Bethancourt punches little holes in pieces of paper in this offering from his "Naked Banjos" CD.

This Day in History: November 25

The British and Hessian forces were ordered to withdraw from New York on November 25, 1783. As the retreating armies relinquished control of northern Manhattan, the American army advanced toward the city at a respectable distance behind the Royalist army (about an hour apart). General Washington along with General George Clinton (who served as Governor of the State of New York from 1777 to 1795) marched to Manhattan through what is now Washington Heights and Inwood. While in the area, Washington and Clinton stopped at the Blue Bell Tavern, which was located at what is now 181st Street and Broadway. Both men were on their horses with the army passing in review as they marched southward to McGown’s Pass and lower Manhattan.

Saturday, November 24, 2007

A Question of Priorities

"You see people come here from all walks of life," said booth owner, Gene Branson. "Some people even come a hundred miles to this show." [More]
If gun owners devoted a tenth of that effort and expense to actively championing the right to keep and bear arms, we would be an invincible political force. That most prefer to squabble like learning disabled children over such trivialities as being asked to send an email exemplifies why things are the way they are.

Years ago, before the Great Western Gun Show was forced out of California, I recall being especially bitter over how it could attract tens of thousands of gun owners--yet a counter-protest against the Million Moms preceded by announcements and appeals throughout the "activist" network, only drew a few hundred. And out of all Los Angeles, we'd be lucky to get 50 to show up at an NRA Members' Council meeting, and of those, maybe half a dozen-- of the same people all the time-- actually did any work.

I repeat: If gun owners would get off their lazy, apathetic butts and consistently and proactively devote time, effort and treasure to the cause, we would be invincible. It's easy to point the finger at politicians for attacking us, or NRA management for compromising, and I'm not saying that should stop, but put in perspective, politicians wouldn't betray us if they didn't dare--and compromises wouldn't be made if they weren't perceived as advantageous or necessary.

British Traditions Upheld

Police will be armed with powerful machine guns to guard cash deliveries against armed robbers in the run up to Christmas.
It's nice to know money is still valued more than the lives of mere subjects, who are forbidden to guard themselves.

Naivete

"Parents are so naive," Jiggetts said. "They have to understand that it's not OK to have guns in their houses unless they are locked."

Yeah, right.

I've managed to raise two children just fine, and so have millions of others. Point being, by the time a boy is 14, a household that practiced true "gun safety" would have produced a marksman capable of giving the old man a run for his money.

And by the way--who did the shotgun belong to? How the hell do you investigate the death of a child without determining that?

This may seem harsh--I can't imagine this woman's agony. But my natural sympathy is tempered by seeing her point her finger outward, and that does nothing but help empower those intent on placing mandates over the rest of us who had nothing to do with this.

It also provides fodder for "Authorized Journalists" like Luz Lazo and Julian Walker to appeal to the weak-minded among their readers with another agenda-driven sob story, so that even more reason-free, feelings-based edicts can be demanded.

We're the Only Ones Teaching Our Children Well Enough

A 5-year-old boy who was accidentally shot by his stepfather, a Venice police officer, was released from the hospital and was recovering at home on Friday.

Interesting past Masters has there, what with that prior "gun related incident" and all. I wonder what would have happened had you or I pointed at weapon at his "fellow officer"? I also wonder what child protective services would do if this involved a non-"Only One" family...?

Results are Results

"...I am not sure what to make of the senator’s comments, except to say results are results,” Katie Levinson said.
Uh, yes, Katie, that's the point exactly.

We're the Only Ones Having One for the Road Enough

A police officer charged with drunken driving in a car wreck that killed two men and injured a third was assigned to desk duty pending an internal investigation, a police spokesman said Friday.
I'm wondering if that misdemeanor charge isn't a little harsh--after all, he is an "Only One." But I do appreciate that the original police report was changed.

[Via SameNoKami]

Red's Report: 11/24/07

From Ryan Horsley:

I received an e-mail from Rick Celata the other day, explaining how the ATF refuses to return his property and how his legal bills are substantial:
http://redstradingpost.blogspot.com/2007/11/this-could-happen-to-you.html

...By the way our petition has broken 5,000 signatures:
http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?redstrad&1

I am sending off a link to all of our Senators, so they can see the need for change.

This Day in History: November 24

Information having been given that divers of the late sutlers, and some of the inhabitants have opened tippling houses within and adjacent to the encampment of the army, by which the design of banishing the Sutlers from the army is in a great measure frustrated. The Deputy Quarter Master General is required forthwith, to make diligent inquiry, and examination, for discovering such houses, and suppressing them, and to assure all who are driving this pernicious trade, that if continued any longer, their liquors shall be seized, and they expelled from the neighbourhood of the army, on pain of the severest punishment if they return.

Friday, November 23, 2007

Humankind Declared Cosmic Menace

Forget about the threat that mankind poses to the Earth: our activities may be shortening the life of the universe too.
The solution is obvious: we need to set up a system to allow physics labs to purchase quantum offset credits. From the government. That, and probably enact a universal lead ammo ban, too.

Y'know with this kind of absolute metaphysical crap being touted as science, I'm not overly concerned about establishment "wisdom" billing people like me a kook.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to open this container and see how Schrödinger's cat is doing.

For Once I'm Speechless

Today's mail came in, and included a hefty box from CCRKBA. Seems I was the April 2007 Gun Rights Defender of the Month for my expose resulting in the FAA issuing a correction in the Federal Register to their previous assertion that the Second Amendment is a collective right. This is the first I've heard of this, so I hope they don't think I'm an ingrate for not thanking them before now.

I must say this caught me flat-footed--I do recall corresponding with John M. Snyder a while back thinking he was going to mention something about my work in a write-up, and when I heard nothing more assumed it was one of those articles that never makes it past the idea stage. I'll also admit that I'm generally one to forego awards and banquets and all their trappings because there is work in the trenches to be done--that, and if I'd wanted to be popular, I'd be prattling on about Paris and Britney instead of ...ick!... gun rights.

But the plaque sure is nice (it matches my office/den decor perfectly),and their write-up is too, especially when you consider I've not been shy about disagreeing with CCRKBA in the past, and they're big enough to not hold that against me.

So thank you, Mr. Gottlieb and Mr. Snyder. I appreciate the thoughtfulness and generosity you have extended to a wild-eyed, intemperate troublemaker like me, and will do my best to continue being one.

Sorry, Wrong Number

TEENAGERS will have an anti-gun film beamed direct to their mobiles in a new bid to keep them the right side of the thin Bluetooth line.

Interesting that the MySpace poster is a 40-year-old single male who calls himself "Nemesis," and who is reaching out to young people. Interesting and a little creepy.

Me, I'm wondering if the dream sequence video game had been Super Mario instead of a first person shooter, would the thug have fantasized about jumping on top of the cops amidst cartoon background noises instead of shooting them? That and what is it with UK cops and racial assumptions? Every damned one of the first responders look like PCSO Steve, and the perps all look like, well...

Perhaps the warning at the end of the film clip would benefit from a minor edit:

Ann Woolner is a Bloomberg News Columnist

The opinions expressed are her own.
Master is pleased...

Paul Takes Second in AOL Poll

So naturally they feature supplemental information on all the other "major" candidates except him.

[Via M. Terry]

UPDATE: I see now he's tied for first with Rudy at 21%.

This Day in History: November 23

Sir: I am compelled by repeated Complaints of the Inhuman treatment still shewn to the unhappy Prisoners in your hands to call upon you for a clear and explicit answer to my Letter o ? the 14th instant. This I shall expect to receive by Monday Evening next. Their sufferings demand immediate redress, and unless, I obtain the most satisfactory Assurances on this Head, duty will constrain me to retaliate instantly, on the Prisoners in my possession. I am etc.
War is hell.

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Thanksgiving Day, 2007


No original blogging today, although I am linking to WarOnGuns' traditional Thanksgiving post.

My prayer for you is that you have something to be thankful for. I know I sure do.

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

We're the Only Ones Dog Day Afternoon Enough

A Teton County, Idaho family is outraged after they say a sheriff's deputy tried to murder their dog in their own front yard.
I really hate to go into the Thanksgiving holiday with a story like this, but for God's sake, what the hell is wrong with these damned sheep meekly complying and leading their pet out for slaughter? And what the hell is the name of the thug "Only One" who did this?

Literally, he would have had to get through me first. Barring a completely undisclosed set of facts, if this story as told even loosely approximates the truth, lethal force to defend the pet would be morally, if not legally, justifiable.

Damn it, why do people put up with this Nazi crap in America?

RELATED: Vicious Dog Protocol

We're the Only Ones Not Licensing Enough

Mark P. Ragsdale, who shot and wounded a Shrewsbury police officer last year, has filed a civil suit seeking a new license to carry a firearm...

According to Shrewsbury police reports, Officers Rice and R. Ryan Chartrand were let into the home by a neighbor around 2:30 a.m. to investigate a burglar alarm. The officers were not aware Mr. Ragsdale was home when they entered. Mr. Ragsdale had told the alarm company he set off the alarm. The officers did not announce themselves when they entered the home.

A report by Detective Lt. Daniel G. Sklut said Mr. Ragsdale armed himself with a .380-caliber handgun when the alarm went off. “Mark Ragsdale stated that he could hear someone coming up the stairs toward his bedroom,” Lt. Sklut’s report said. “He stated that the hallway was in complete darkness and he saw a dark figure and discharged his firearm. He then heard someone yell “police.” Mark Ragsdale stated that he never said anything or challenged the figure, he just fired. When he heard someone yell “police” he immediately dropped the gun and went into a prone position.

So the chief won't give permission to carry a firearm now out of what, revenge? What's the problem here, aside from negligent private residence entry procedures on the part of law enforcement? It sounds like a training issue that points its finger back at his department more than anything else.

The fact that Ragsdale had been in a bar until the wee hours--reported here to make it sound like he's a morning drinker (and the report even stated he was only "moderately under the influence")--could apply to any number of Citizens, and even to "Only Ones," certainly known to congregate at "cop bars" when off duty (and sometimes when on).

There's so much innuendo and so little substance in this "report." There's no mistaking where the sympathies of the "Authorized Journalists" lie in this hit piece. And as for the former chief claiming there was enough evidence to bring charges, sorry, pal. The grand jury thought not, and the prosecutor declined to resubmit the case. That means Ragsdale's presumed innocent in the eyes of the law--you know, all those words that gave you an excuse to draw a salary for all those years.

It also sounds like everybody's going after Ragsdale due to chemical imbalance symptoms of diabetes that can be managed with insulin--it's easy for a disgruntled ex-employee to make charges of "violent mood swings," but one must ask: where's the actual violence? Were reports made? Were charges filed? If this stands, can it be used to deny self defense rights to all diabetics? Perhaps he can add an Americans With Disabilities complaint to his lawsuit...

And no, I'm not suddenly advocating licensing of rights. I just don't think the "authorities" ought to be able to abuse the law to reward or punish based on personal agendas, which is what I'm reading here, in spite of the best efforts of Scott J. Croteau and the "TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF" to mask it.

Technical Difficulties

A technical glitch delayed a mass e-mail to alert the University of New Hampshire to a reported gun incident on the Durham campus Sunday night, the university said Tuesday.

The alert should have gone out Monday evening, when campus police say they learned how serious the incident was, but wasn't transmitted until 8:22 a.m. Tuesday, the university and university police said.
Thank goodness there's a backup system in place, and one can always consult the UNH "Shooting Protocol." Let's see, stay calm, maintain eye contact, try to stall...consult a bunch of pastors and a rabbi, try to run...nope, nothing about returning fire.

Oh, here it is, section 26.1 on page 69. They say you can't.

Emulating Success

The Home Office is preparing to launch a nationwide communications strategy on gun crime, in what will be seen as the Home Secretary Jacqui Smith’s first attempt to demonstrate to the public how the Government is tackling the issue...

Insiders say the communications brief is still being discussed with advertising agencies, as the Home Office would like to emulate the success Metropolitan Police advertising campaigns have had as part of the Trident campaign.
Because as we've seen time and again, nothing stops a reptile in his tracks quite like a "communications strategy." And when predators are aprowl, nothing calms the cud-chewers down more than soothing noises from the herdsman .

We're the Only Ones All Fired Up Enough

A Capitol Police officer has been suspended in connection with the series of restroom fires that broke out in Senate office buildings over the past three months.
Maybe she was trying to flush out Larry Craig...?

[Via Mack]
[More from "
The Only Ones" Files]

TV Does Heller

The Today Show, actually--they were reporting on yesterday's Supreme Court decision to hear Heller, and the anchorbabe presented the opposition's case to the effect that the Second Amendment is based on 18th Century conditions, as if that makes it no longer relevant, and as if that is sufficient grounds to pass disarmament edicts. I thought it significant, though, that the "Authorized Journalists" are already starting the spin to reframe the debate away from "collective rights," so if they lose, they'll have fixed the "no longer relevant" alternative in the consciousness of their viewers.

I also caught a few seconds of Wayne on CNN. I wish they would've asked him why NRA tried to "foul the waters" and, in light of that, if they think it's right that now they're getting so much of the media's attention.

Authorized Journalists Cheer "Gun Violence"

It's hard to talk over all the shooting, but Timothy Olyphant gives enough reasons to cheer on his Agent 47...

I guess maybe I'm being inconsistent. I just got done complaining about Brits wetting themselves over movie posters with guns, and now I'm upset about the Chicago Tribune/LA Times applauding a violent "gun movie."

It's just the hypocrisy of these damned chic socialists--they're all for glorifying assassins who slay without remorse, but the first to use their influence to demand the disarmament of Citizens who merely wish the means to defend themselves against sociopaths. Plus, speaking of posters, in every one I've seen so far, the idiot has his fingers on the triggers. But he's intended to look way cool doing it.

GRendell Vanquished!

Mad Troll Sent Howling Into Darkness Without (our) Arms [More]


But put down that cup of mead, brave Geats--there is no time to celebrate. For soon, we must face the monster's demon hag mother...


[Via Mindful Musings]

Our Eyes--They BURN!!!

Complaints about a set of film posters featuring actors brandishing guns have been upheld by advertising watchdogs...

[T]he ASA said the actor's expression was aggressive, and the posters could be seen to condone violence. It ordered that the two posters should not be displayed again.

Good grief--do these degenerate heirs of what was once a land of greatness have no shred of pride or dignity left?

This Day in History: November 21

Resolved, That a Declaration of Rights, asserting and securing from encroachment the great Principles of civil and religious Liberty, and the unalienable Rights of the People, together with Amendments to the most ambiguous and exceptional Parts of the said Constitution of Government, ought to be laid before Congress, and the Convention of the States that shall or may be called for the Purpose of Amending the said Constitution, for their consideration, previous to the Ratification of the Constitution aforesaid, on the part of the State of North Carolina.

DECLARATION OF RIGHTS...

That the people have a right to keep and bear arms; that a well regulated militia composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural and safe defence of a free state. That standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to Liberty, and therefore ought to be avoided, as far as the circumstances and protection of the community will admit; and that in all cases, the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by the civil power.

It seems pretty clear what the North Carolinians thought they were signing into, and they seemed to have no problem whatsoever reconciling the separately declared individual nature of the right alongside the cooperative rationale for a militia.

Anyone who maintains this is not what the Founders understood the Second Amendment to mean is quite simply a damned liar. Let us hope that no more than four damned liars are currently seated on the Supreme Court.

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

SCOTUS TO HEAR HELLER

The Supreme Court said Tuesday it will decide whether the District of Columbia can ban handguns, a case that could produce the most in-depth examination of the constitutional right to "keep and bear arms" in nearly 70 Years.
Hang on to your hats.

More on the SGT Major

I have done my part for this nation for all of my life, and I, as well as my cousin, a United States Representative from Ca have served the Democratic Party for years. I know who I campaigned for in 2000 and 2004, becasue i was at the Dem HQ and was canvassing for Gore and for Kerry.

That certainly is not inconsistent with someone who supports IANSA's goals...

And Now, the Rest of the Story...

Phoenix police apprehended a robbery suspect who briefly held employees of a 24-hour emergency veterinary clinic hostage early Monday morning.
From Featherless Biped, who sent me this story:
This is an establishment with a big NO FIREARMS sign at the entrance...

A Model of Restraint

There’s another very significant vulnerability that deserves mention: Restraining orders are commonly issued either through manipulative claims of fear or simply as a matter of course, meaning a man who owns guns may not have legal access to them throughout the duration of the order.

My two cents, added to this...

"Free!"

The Douglas County Sheriff’s Office will provide 500 free firearm safety kits to local residents...

This program was developed by the National Shooting Sports Foundation and funded by the U.S. Department of Justice Office.
So they're not "free." The money used to buy them was plundered from productive Citizens. And, of course, "safety," when it comes to gun locks, is a relative concept dependent on time, place and circumstances...
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Newspeak. It isn't just for novels any more.

We're the Only Ones Represented Diversely Enough

London's Metropolitan Police has been forced to spend 15,000 pounds creating "ethnically diverse" mascots after complaints about a model deemed too white and too male, reports said Tuesday.

Met chief Sir Ian Blair ordered the new politically correct (PC) models after an Asian officer complained about PCSO Steve, the mascot produced to visit to schools to promote the police force.

Specifically critics said the fact that Steve was white, with blue eyes and blond hair, risked leaving Asian and women officers "isolated," said the Daily Telegraph.

I mean, it's not like they have the resources, ability or obligation to actually protect people, so why not spend money on mascots and posters and bus ads...?

In the interest of helping our "Only One" friends in the UK come up with racially diverse mascots, perhaps we could let them have some of the ones being discarded on this side of the pond by athletic teams that have caved in to political pressure over racial stereotypes. Or perhaps forgo human mascots altogether, PETA willing, and spread the good news of the police state using friendly animal characters like this or like this...

The Podium Pounder

Judging from Rendell's podium-pounding announcement of his plans last week, he's not going to say "pretty please" when calling for gun-violence reform.
"Podium-pounding"?

Like this...?



Or like this...?


Let's hope Pennsylvania gun owners have enough control over their legislators to tell this tinpot dictator to go pound sand.

It's All in the Grip

Hill's attorney, Earl Xaiz, argued in a motion that the felony count should be dismissed because the gun Hill sold was considered a shotgun, which can be legally sold to 18-year-olds. But federal law bans sales of shotguns with pistol grips to anyone younger than 21.
Because as we all know, the addition of a grip makes the firearm so much more powerful and deadly.

Counterstrike

Some of the dealers settled the suits and agreed to work with a court-appointed monitor, but the owner of the Summerville shop, Larry Mickalis, countersued, accusing Mr. Bloomberg and the city of conspiracy, fraud and libel, among other charges.
Meanwhile, BATFU is too busy harassing family businesses owned by dealers like Mr. Mickalis and Ryan Horsley to look into pursuing obvious and willful violations by Bloomberg and his James Mintz Group mercenary co-conspirators.

Red's Report for Nov. 20

Sullivan Weasel Words Findings
What? BATFU didn't revoke their license. We just harassed them into not renewing...

The BATFU of Yesteryear
Yep--they were corrupt megalomaniacal punks 12 years ago, too.

[More on Red's Trading Post from WarOnGuns]

Garden State Liberty Day Celebration Proposal

New Jersey may finally outlaw gun trafficking.
No doubt in celebration for being first to ratify the Bill of Rights...

This Day in History: November 20

On November 20, 1789, New Jersey became the first state to ratify the Bill of Rights—the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution—guaranteeing the fundamental rights and freedoms of all American citizens.

I guess they also pioneered First In, First Out...?

Monday, November 19, 2007

A Question for the Secretary of the Standing Army


I know I'm just a lowly member of the unorganized militia 'n all, but would someone please mind telling me just what in bloody freaking hell Command SGT Major Daniel Luke is doing posing on a world government-lobbying gungrabber site, in uniform, in blatant violation of Army Regulation 670–1, Uniforms and Insignia, Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia, Part One General Information and Responsibilities, Chapter 1 Introduction, 1–10. When the wear of the Army uniform is required or prohibited:
j. Wearing Army uniforms is prohibited in the following situations:
(1) In connection with the furtherance of any political or commercial interests, or when engaged in off-duty civilian employment
?

You guys are still under civilian authority, right? So why is one of your noncoms out there exploiting the uniform and insignias of service, and undermining the unalienable right of sovereign American Citizens, by appealing to international authorities to regulate arms in contravention of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights--especially after the representative designated by the Commander in Chief has specifically repudiated global gun control as the administration's official position?

Note: I tried to check up on Sgt. Luke on the off-chance that someone posted his picture on the IANSA site without his authorization, or God forbid, that he died in service and a relative posted it. There's not much out there, but as this is a violation regardless, the Army should investigate.

UPDATE: The name tag on the above photo looks like it says "Diaz," not "Luke." I have been able to find some search hits for a Command SGT Major Daniel Luke Diaz, and if this is the same person, some of the posts ostensibly made by him say he is retired. I have no idea if the Army has recourse in this--I'm not sure what authority they would have to do anything but request that IANSA remove the picture. Whether or not--assuming this is willful--they would have any ability to pursue this with a retired sergeant is a matter for people knowledgeable in such matters.
UPDATE 2: Here we go. Hey Sarge, did you post your picture on the Million Faces website or is somebody doing this without your consent?

UPDATE 3: The Army just arrived.

Trust Busters

Some organizers cited "security reasons" for the candidate's sudden withdrawal. An advertisement in a Sikh newspaper said the fund-raiser, which was also to have featured President Clinton as a guest, had been postponed "due to the advice of the Secret Service." Others involved said some of those planning the fund-raiser failed either the campaign's vetting process or a Secret Service review...
What "security reasons" could there be? Ah, here it is...
Many of the Sikh men carried ceremonial daggers, often hidden under their clothes. Some who led the parade brandished swords. However, participants said the ritual weapons did not justify Mrs. Clinton's absence.
A savvy candidate would now do a spontaneous photo op with a bunch of dagger-wielding Sikhs. And he'd also do one at a random gun range surrounded by a bunch of unvetted armed Americans, without a security man in sight. The message ought to be one of them trusting him, not the other way around.

Removing All Doubt

We need laws that will close the loopholes that existing laws have. I have three handguns in my home. I have been a member of the NRA. I learned gun safety from a gun enthusiast way back when. Guns used in the right way are one of our American privileges.
J.W. Pollard proves out the words of Lincoln better than anything I could possibly say.