Dear Ms. Letellier,
You apparently possess knowledge that many of us interested in the Second Amendment have been seeking for some time to no avail.
In your published op-ed, you state:
Each side can cite Colonial history and quote from the Founding Fathers. Because both sides in this debate offer challenging and convincing arguments, both deserve equal time in your paper, if the intent truly is to educate readers on the Bill of Rights.
Yet according to Constitutional law scholar Stephen P. Halbrook:
In recent years it has been suggested that the second amendment protects the "collective" right of states to maintain militias, but not the right of "the people" to keep and bear arms. If anyone entertained this notion in the period in which the Constitution and Bill of Rights were debated and ratified, it remains one of the most closely guarded secrets of the eighteenth century, for no known surviving writing of the 1787-1791 period states that thesis.
Ms. Letellier, I’ve always believed that debates should be about determining the truth. You have publicly made a remarkable claim that refutes the leading authorities on the subject. If substantiated, your claim will have significant impact on current understanding and future court cases.
Both you and Prof. Halbrook can’t be right. One of you must be wrong.
What “challenging and convincing arguments” did the Framers make to disparage the right of individuals to keep and bear arms?
Would you please provide some of those quotes and their sources that you say exist, so that we can “truly…educate readers on the Bill of Rights”?
Sincerely,
David Codrea
