Well, They Selectively Edited My Response...

...to our old pal Katherine Letellier. You remember, the teacher who claimed quotes from the founders supported a collective rights theory of the Second Amendment, and then couldn't substantiate her position when I challenged her.

For reasons known only to the editors of The Free-Lance Star, they chose to omit the last two sentences, that is, the whole point of my letter:

Since she made a public claim, wouldn't it be appropriate if she provided some of those quotes that she says exist? Or issued a retraction if she cannot?

Why do you suppose they did that?

What's Wrong With This Picture?

No, I'm not pointing out that some sheep would rather have merchandise than freedom tools, or that cops and businesses are funding another pointless media-circus "buyback." We should have come to expect such nonsense by now.

What I find truly absurd about this article is this:

The two were among dozens of gun-toting residents who converged on a shopping center parking lot Saturday to anonymously [emphasis added--DC] swap firearms for gift certificates as part of a program aimed at reducing violence in this crime-plagued city.

Good job, Sandy Cohen of the Associated Press!

You've now announced the names of "Big Daddy" Willis, Charlene Watt and Ruther Daniels. But I suppose if these three had the acumen to withhold their names, they wouldn't be turning in guns for gift certificates.

Wonder what poor Charlene will do when she finds out she needs to turn in about 20 more shotguns to get that plasma TV?

We're the Only...HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!

REGIONAL police director Prospero Noble has directed all policemen to seal the barrels of their service firearms with masking tapes starting December 30 to assure that no indiscriminate firing will welcome the New Year.

Noble said he would conduct an inspection on December 31 to check if all the policemen under his command followed his directive.

Uhh...Prospero?

They couldn't just take the tape off after your inspection?

"Please, Let Us Debate Gun Ownership Without 'Acrimony'"

Why become "very angry" at my merely expressing an opinion with which one disagrees?

Well, John Paul, maybe it's because you are free to ignore our opinions and no ninjas will come after after you.

Guess what happens to one of us when we ignore one of those evil citizen disarmament edicts you promote?

What Have We Been Saying All Along?

Wouldn't it make more sense to define the ultimate battle as one for a national ban on handguns...?

Sorry, Jenny Price.

You get the same answer I gave Sallie Tisdale.

[Thanks to GunShowOnTheNet]