Beats me. Whoever they are, they're evil cowards.
They want to
out gun owners but make sure
no one knows who they are.
What filthy, contemptible bastards.
Still, it may backfire--especially as the gungrabbers continue to insist on laws identifying gun owners, we can point to stunts like this as examples of how it is abused and real people are endangered. If one ends up victimized, the mask will be ripped off in civil proceedings, at which point we should have some more addresses, which, according to their rationale would be "public records".
I think outing these punks ought to be a priority. Anybody know any hotshot hackers who like a good challenge?
And how unsurprising to see
Peter Hamm has no moral qualms about this, and in fact approves of it. Tells you all you need to know about his ethics, doesn't it? Still, isn't it interesting
he admits " criminals are more likely to pick a target who isn't armed"?
That ought to be a headline in itself.
[Via cycjec]