Police on Long Island have a new weapon to help them keep guns from returning to the streets.
It's a gun crusher. Authorities in Suffolk County showed it off yesterday in Yaphank.
I haven't really thought about this deeply enough to claim certitude, but the challenge came up on Sunni Maravillosa's blog a while back to name one tool that isn't morally neutral.
She said something I agree with:
I've written a fair amount on firearms, and I'm usually careful to point out that a gun is morally neutral, as are knives, swords, sticks, stones, etc. How a person uses an object gives it a moral value for that act, and that act alone. An object just is. Humans -- rightly and wrongly -- imbue objects and ideas with moral overtones.
Still, I had a nagging discomfort that I formed into a comment:
"Can You Name the One Tool that Isn't Morally Neutral?"
Thumbscrews?
Cat-o-nine-tails?
Iron Maidens?
Racks?
Suicide bomber explosive vests?
You could argue they could be used as museum pieces, but that would not be using them for the purposes they were designed for...and while the thing itself isn't evil, the purpose for which it was designed sure seems to be...
Can something specifically designed for evil purpose truly be considered morally neutral?
I don't know if I'm trying to have my cake and eat it too, here, but if these observations have merit, I'd include this obscene "gun crusher" among the other objects.