The ATF’s classification of Sig Sauer’s device as a firearm silencer was not “arbitrary, capricious, . . . or otherwise not in accordance with law.” [More]Thanks for showing us the superiority of Republican nominees, George H.W. Bush appointee Paul Barbadaro!
I do have one question, putting the pesky Bill of Rights aside for a moment: Without being able to assess and compare all ATF rulings, enforcement and determination actions, how do you know if they're consistent?
Probably the same way you determined infringements are legal: Because you wear a black robe and you said so.
[Via everrest]
