Request to Modify Bump Stock Stay Filed

Likewise, the Codrea Plaintiffs-Appellants (No. 18-cv-3086 (D.D.C.) in their Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 5-1, p. 24), Reply Brief (Doc. 18, p. 17), and Principal Brief before this Court (p. 29), requested a “systemwide preliminary injunction.” See, Armstrong v. Davis , 275 F.3d 849, 870 (9th Cir. 2001)(holding that “[s]ystem-wide relief is required if the injury is the result of violations of a statute or the constitution that are attributable to policies or practices pervading the whole system (even though injuring a relatively small number of plaintiffs), or if the unlawful policies or practices affect such a broad range of plaintiffs that an overhaul of the system is the only feasible manner in which to address the class’s injury.”) [More]

Everyone affected should be invited to the party.

Tonight on Armed American Radio

[More]

We'll be talking about the stay granted to the plaintiffs.

Go to the Armed American Radio website to find a station near you or to listen via live streaming.

Stay Granted to Bump Stock Plaintiffs

Ordered... [T]he effective date of the Bump-Stock Rule, 83 Fed. Reg. 66514 (Dec. 26, 2018), be administratively stayed in its application only as to the named Appellants in appeals Nos. 19-5042 and 19-5044, pending further order of this Court. The purpose of this stay is exclusively to give the Court sufficient opportunity to consider the disposition of this highly expedited appeal, and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of the appeal. [More]

Some of us have escaped the 26th deadline. Note this only applies to the plaintiffs.

An article has been submitted to AmmoLand and will be forthcoming.