Friday, August 23, 2013

If You See Something, Say Something

Read and watch this and seethe.  [More]

Note the naive little girl at the end who is relieved if something like this happens, the "heroes" will save  her. Just like government--create a threat and then provide the rescue--it's one of the oldest tricks in the book. It figures this whole thing was engineered by the parasite class.

Thing is, there's no lawful way I know of that people can be taken hostage in a terror situation without their knowledge that it's all kabuki and their consent to participate.

As such, and since it appears very real crimes have been committed, I figure the best way to bring those responsible to account --and to keep this nonsense from happening again-- is to report it to the proper authorities.  Isn't that what we're told we must do, instead of being "vigilantes" and taking the law into our own hands?

So I reported the crime to the FBI:

If your eyes are like mine, you won't be able to read this even if you click on it and enlarge it, so here is the text I sent them:


I wish to report a multiple kidnapping/hostage-taking situation that includes assault, battery and conspiracy, not to mention reckless endangerment.  All the evidence with leads to parties involved in the conspiracy has been video-recorded and you can view it here: http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/students-not-told-kidnapping-actually-swat-training/    

I know of no legitimate statutory authority under which school and police officials could lawfully subject minor citizens to such treatment without knowledge and consent, and as such, the perpetrators’ motives notwithstanding, the act of displaying a weapon, taking them hostage, binding their wrists and subjecting them to terror are criminal acts that demand prosecution. Furthermore, as Ohio is a "shall issue" concealed carry state, a citizen could very well have seen this and attempted to intervene, creating a potentially lethal situation.  You are now on notice that very real terror crimes are suspected of having been committed by these boneheads. The evidence is before you and I intend to inform others that you have been notified.  I call on you to investigate this incident and, if no lawful reasons exist to sanction children being taken hostage without their knowledge or consent, I call on you to arrest and prosecute all perpetrators and co-conspirators.

Me, they'll just ignore.  Hell, they may even threaten me under the Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 1001 fines and imprisonment warning they make against "false information," but since this is true, and since it appears the SWAT team and school administrators really did engage in terrorism, I don't see how.

So in the interests of making enough noise that it can't be ignored, care to join me?

UPDATE: An evident comment from the police chief says it's all a big misunderstanding and the kids were informed.

I still don't know what the hell he means by:
Unfortunately, some of the information released to the media portrayed this as an event in which police and school officials took advantage of innocent children who had no idea that this was a mock incident.  
That tells me it was not a media error, and that they were going on information released to them by the LEOs.

Troy confirms Weis not on team as another controversy emerges

“Our immediate actions today re-affirm our commitment to the fundamental individual right to bear arms,” she concluded. [More]
Today's last (I hope) Gun Rights Examiner report notes sometimes you no sooner get done cleaning one mess than you find another one that's even worse.

ATF advances executive gun controls with proposed trust rule change

That no violent crime-reducing justification has been advanced pointing to gun trusts as a problem shows this move to be about the Obama administration flexing its executive action muscles. [More]
This afternoon's Gun Rights Examiner report notes there's more than one way to skin us of our rights.

UPDATE: See addendum from Joshua Prince.

Fundraiser to be held tomorrow for oath-keeping Florida sheriff

As a result, Finch is facing felony charges with no income with which he can support his family, which includes two special needs children, or to defend himself, a situation Gun Rights Examiner readers will recognize as the same tactic the government is using to break down the defenses of the Reese family. [More]

Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report addresses a frequent criticism/complaint I hear about Oath Keepers supposedly not interposing themselves in situations where their decisions can make a difference – here is one who did, and he’s being hung out to dry. Now it’s time for those critics to step forward and interpose themselves into this situation -- provided they’re not just a bunch of all-talk hypocrites who demand others do what they will not.

Caught in the Act Redux

ATSNtv's new "Stop the Threat" episode plays again tonight. [Details]

Mike the Hero

You keep believing that, Yoav Gonen. [More]

Yet the very numbers presented show Bloomberg's position losing by a landslide among the general population.

"Authorized Journalists": Is it any wonder we love them so?

Secret Power

If only more good people realized we all have it... [More]

Ayoob on Zimmerman

Liston Matthews has compiled links to Mas Ayoob's trial observations. [More]

A Taxing Proposition

Hey, someone's gotta pay for what you had no part it -- might as well be you. [More]

Ulterior Motives

While advocates of the bans like to claim that there are good, lead-free alternatives readily available, the truth is that these projectiles, along with being expensive and often hard to find, could be declared illegal under existing federal law. [More]
The antis, of course, know that.

Jeff Knox also makes a great point about Civil War battlefields.

This Day in History: August 23

On the moment of my arrival here to day, was surprised to find the demand of teams encreased to eighty, in which it is said your Excellency acquiessed. This will totally put it out of our power to draw forage from below the lines to form the magazines mentioned in my instructions, or to perform the ordinary duties of teams in this army. I submit to your Excellency whether it is not more than probable that the enemy will in the course of the campaign make some movements which may require my speedy removal to oppose them. How humiliating must it be to me, at such an instant, perhaps with the clamors of a country, to be fixed in a camp unable to move, when the force your Excellency has honored me with is much more than sufficient for the defence of Westpoint? [More]