"The District's regulation of handguns at issue here is squarely in the mainstream and eminently reasonable, minimally intruding on the right announced in Heller to bear arms for the protection of 'hearth and home,' while at the same time safeguarding public safety under traditional police powers," Nickles wrote, asking that the plaintiffs lawsuit be dismissed. [More]Which explains the hysteria they gin up whenever anyone tries to open carry. We don't dare let that become a social norm.
The case is Palmer v DC. The government is arguing against having to recognize our unalienable right to bear arms--you know, the one they are expressly forbidden to infringe..?
We realize, of course, that if it were up to Nickles & Co., "squarely in the mainstream" would be no country many of us would want to live in--and if he agreed, we wouldn't really be able to do all that much about.
Read the Motion for Summary Judgment here.
[Via Ambiguous ambiguae]