Dinkins Hit-and-Run Creates New Character Questions for Gun-Grabbing Oath-Breaker

So which is it?  Was he aware at the time, enough to make an official police report claiming the bicyclist was at fault, or was he oblivious, needing to be told he’d had a collision that spun the deliveryman 180 degrees and left him sprawled on the pavement? [More]

That's the problem with oath-breaking.  Once you lie so publicly, completely and shamelessly, why should anyone believe you about anything?

An Answer for Piers

You're certainly  welcome to try. [More]

Note to Fudds who throw EBRs under the bus: You sure you wouldn't really rather be pals?

To Each Its Own

Although somebody ought to tell it reptiles don't have ti... [More]

Correcting the Record (Again)

From a misguided comment under "Mexico Repeats Call for U.S. Gun Ban while Ignoring the Obvious":

"The problem is not Obama, fast and tedious was started during the Bush administration."

That's a misdirection Obama defenders have been using to try and confuse the issue and take focus off crimes under his administration. Outrageously, it does not serve the media's interest to correct the record. Based on results, people believe it, at least more than understand what really went down.

I tried to address that, years ago, but my voice only carries so far, and rarely escapes the echo chamber. That's just the reality of the situation.

That comment reminds me a refresher wouldn't hurt, courtesy of the internet Archive/Wayback Machine, since Examiner.com removed all articles: "Wide Receiver’ CI: ‘It had nothing to do with Bush or even DOJ."

And no, there were no "tracking devices" placed in the Wide Receiver guns, either.

Here's more if you're interested, just understand that many of the links will need the Wayback treatment.