These Prozi Fourth Estate Fifth Columnists oughtta know... [More]
UPDATE: Anthony Martin has a lot more to say.
Thursday, August 28, 2014
Anti-gun women continue to corroborate ‘progressive’ contradiction
In other words, someone who says she wants more laws to protect innocents recommends victimizing innocents and breaking the law. And the pathetic thing is, her enthusiasm for criminal acts is tame compared to two “common sense gun safety advocates” who think that “SWATting” gun owners by calling 911 and reporting armed threats in the store, upping the chances of “gun violence” and potentially getting innocent people killed, is the appropriate way to deal with citizens who are peaceably open carrying. [More]Today's Gun Rights Examiner report notes perhaps the name of the organization ought to be changed to Moms Demand Tricking Police into Performing Executions of Gun Owners.
Just Give Them What They Want
I won't watch these. I know what's going to happen and I don't need to in order to know what happens when you are forced to rely on the mercy of demons. [More]
That's why I will not submit to their enablers, which is what everyone who interferes with the defense capabilities of good people is.
[Via Florida Guy]
That's why I will not submit to their enablers, which is what everyone who interferes with the defense capabilities of good people is.
[Via Florida Guy]
We're the Only Ones Susceptible Enough
"A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that Connecticut police cannot claim immunity to quash lawsuits seeking millions of dollars in damages from a botched 2008 raid by a SWAT team that severely injured a homeowner and killed his friend." [More]So who is going to pay any settlement? The victim pool?
We're the Only Ones Promising Enough
I'll put a round in your @$$ so quick... [Watch]I wonder how the "good citizen" in comments who thinks this was proper will feel when it's his turn in the barrel.
I sure didn't see anything where I'd feel justified to threaten deadly force.
UPDATE: The BPPD left a detailed comment under the video explaining why they did.
[Via Florida Guy]
No Offense
Via Leonard Embody, who writes:
Remember I was charged with the crime of possessing a silencer even though they didn't know what was inside my gun case. They opened the case without a warrant. Then they said I had to show them paperwork. Then when they found the form 3 inside the gun case they continued anyway. A magistrate approved the charge. Then I went to a preliminary hearing where the judge said there was probable cause for the charge and that my federal paperwork looked like it had a "boy scout seal". then 10 months later I was indicted by the grand jury. finally yesterday the criminal court judge wrote an order dismissing the charge. His order and opinion definitely has some inaccurate findings, but the main thing is that the charge was dismissed.
What Difference Does it Make?
If that is so, then why bother with the process? [More]Been asking that one myself for some time...
[Via Jeffersonian]
We're the Only Ones Killing the Messenger Enough
Agent, Investigate Thyself
We're the Only Ones Exposing Ourselves Enough
Marshall said people can be intimidated by someone carrying a gun if they're not wearing a badge.
"Show me in the Second Amendment where the right to bear arms says you've got a right to carry it exposed," Marshall said.
When the new law took effect last year, Marshall ordered about 3,000 stickers to distribute to business owners who did not want guns on their property. [More]See, you have to be a super-professional Only One to go around in public exposed.
I don't know how they were able to get that quote. I searched all over for an online English-Huttese translator.
[Via DB]
Today's Five Minute Activism -- If It's Worth the Time in Your State
What if Barack Obama could create 5,000,000 new anti-gun voters ... in a tyrannical act of unconstitutional usurpation ... all by the stroke of his pen? [More]And what if only GOA and a handful of us gave a damn? That NRA is avoiding this in order to promote establishment sellouts and suck up to the neocons is inexcusable. Those who say this has no bearing on the "single issue" are either kidding themselves or conning others.
I took a moment to do this. I'm not sure why, probably just reflex loyalty to GOA. Being in Ohio, Democrat Brown is a waste for me. So is that POS RINO Portman.
Do it if you think you can influence someone. You could always ID a good senator in a closely-contested state. A few of us have urged GOA to identify good alternatives in other states for supporters who would prefer not giving Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer a good cackle at our helplessness to effect political change in Prozi states. We've also urged updating the GOA website to show how a politician's position on amnesty has affected their grade.
I don't think it's Larry. I'd like to see Tim Macy publicly address this, because it's created problems in the past to have a candidate who can make a difference and not see that difference exploited.
This Day in History: August 28
I do myself the honor to enclose you a farther list of the exiled Citizens of South Carolina, who wish to return home in the flags to be furnished by the british Commander in chief—the list designates such as are entitled to return in the flags from the manner of their being sent away—and it describes three families who request it as an indulgence. [More]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)