The Plot Thickens

Firearms Concierge may not be who it was looking like. Then again...?

In his first TTAG post, he had a photo of a gun shop. Right clicking on the photo allows you to search Google for the image. The first hit goes here.

In and of itself it proves nothing -- they could have just used that photo. File it under "curious and merits exploration."

Regardless, TTAG should make special efforts to clear Zev Nadler.

[Via YallQaeda]

ALSO: New speculation is that it's an FFL from Melbourne, and I've been told by someone I trust that it is him-- but because I can't provide definitive proof, I won't name him.

It Ain't Over 'til it's Over

Is a critical mass of "faithless electors" possible? Of course. [More]

Does your state have a requirement?

Is it likely?

Beats me.

If it happens, any claim to consent among many of the governed will be ripe for dispute. "It's time" could well become more than a saying.

My guess is the outcome of that would be even more stunning.

Establishing Base Camp

Start with the overtly destructive criminal element. [More]

I see some complaining that anything but a straight climb to the summit is a sellout.

'Which 'People' would Those be?' Update

Stewart Rhodes gave a reply in an email thread regarding the CAIR official advocating "bring[ing] down the regime" that is well worth sharing:

Apparently "the people" only includes them, and not us.  Interesting confirmation of what the more radical on the left want (a desire clearly shared by their fellow travelers within the Islamist movements).  They want the same things.   Allies with a common enemy - the US Constitution, Western Civilization, and all of us "Deplorables" (anyone not them).   They thought they could destroy what is left of our Republic, and us bitter clingers along with it, through abuse of the electoral process by means of intentional mass immigration (both a massive influx of legal "refugees" and millions of illegal aliens) and massive vote fraud, along with a relentless campaign of intimidation/demonization of anyone with a different opinion (just get the numbers on election day, by whatever means, regardless of legality). 

But that strategy ultimately failed, so now these supposed "champions of democracy" are throwing off the mask and are tossing the "democratic process" in the trash, and instead openly call for violent revolution and overthrow our entire political system.  They are desperate enough now to try and get their way through "politics by other means."   Force, violent revolution, warfare.

They really should be careful about shoving open that door of open warfare.  Won't go well for them.  At all.  They are sadly delusional as far as their military capacity is concerned.   If it came to blows, they and all the useful idiots who follow them would be smoked in short order.  Especially now, since they lost the election and would be seen as illegitimate by the vast majority in the military and police.

Frankly, they are very lucky we don't actually want to do what they accuse us of.  But, if they keep at it, they will create their own reality. "

He Who Laughs Last ...

... laughs best:

Anybody see a one of these insufferable smartasses apologize? What they're doing instead is doubling down on their provincialism, and continuing to underestimate and misunderstand the nature and quality of their opposition.

They'd no doubt scoff at any reference to Sun Tzu, which actually works in favor of those they still feel superior to.

[Via Jeet]

Cooper's Rule 4: Be Sure of Your Target.

It is NOT "Firearms Concierge" Zev Nadler. Please spread the word to stop targeting him for something he did not do.

A lot of people are assuming this gunkapo is Mr. Nadler due to him having a similar (one word vs. two) handle. I've provided a trail of corroborating links suggesting he is someone else, but at no time have I definitively said it's him -- rather, I have posed my speculations as questions and sent an inquiry to TTAG that has not been answered.

As for the guy all evidence points to, how he can do it from the slammer is a question enquiring minds want to know.

If they don't want to ID their writer, TTAG ought to issue a clarification notifying their readers who he is not. If they have, I don't see it after a cursory search, but will post a link update if any of you do.