Talk about something that clearly infringes on the very arms that have “some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia [or] that [are] part of the ordinary military equipment, or that … could contribute to the common defense.” Instead, we’re being asked to help provide cover to rationalize yet another Intolerable Act, and this one with the sanction of our “gun rights leaders.” [More]If this doesn’t sit well with you, submit a comment on the proposed rule. I did.
I notice gunkapos supporting this have already started popping up in article comments, so feel free to express yourself there, too.
