Notes from the Resistance...
Anonymous has sure been quiet lately, but today's federal bust of Megaupload riled 'em up good: a retaliatory strike against DoJ.gov (and plenty of other foes) leaving them completely dead. [More]Try it for yourself: http://www.justice.gov/
Now from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform comes this bombshell, giving further details on what's going on with Cunningham... [More]Darrell Issa offers confirmation of sorts to yesterday's WarOnGuns report.
A homeowner was held at gunpoint and his family pet was killed in a mix-up involving a DeKalb County police call. [More]Naturally, the "Authorized Journalists" tell us the name of the homeowner, but not the name of "the officer."
Sunday should be more than, as the current law states, "a rest day for all species of wild bird and wild animal life." It should also be a day that residents can walk without fear in the woods and along the beaches. A day during which horseback riders can follow trails through the forest without the fear of being mistaken for a whitetail buck. [More]Oh, go f*** yourselves.
Ohio gun owners--are you going to make them carry this load alone, or will you help?
It eliminates a criminal charge ripe for abuse where the officer has discretion in determining if you met his or her definition of the term "promptly" that particular day.
It removes the statutory obligation to notify at any time, as well as a criminal penalty.
It removed the "hands in plain sight" requirements since a police officer could simply say your hands were not visible, which results in the same criminal charges. [Read]
Of particular interest to Gun Rights Examiner readers—what they came up with on guns. [More]Today's Gun Rights Examiner commentary notes if they figure they need to know about this, don't you figure we do too?
Because of these intended uses, your walnut products are drugs within the meaning of section 201 (g)(1)(B) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(B)]. Your walnut products are also new drugs under section 201(p) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(p)] because they are not generally recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced conditions. Therefore, under section 505(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 355(a)], they may not be legally marketed with the above claims in the United States without an approved new drug application. Additionally, your walnut products are offered for conditions that are not amenable to self-diagnosis and treatment by individuals who are not medical practitioners; therefore, adequate directions for use cannot be written so that a layperson can use these drugs safely for their intended purposes. Thus, your walnut products are also misbranded under section 502(f)(1) of the Act, in that the labeling for these drugs fails to bear adequate directions for use [21 U.S.C. § 352(f)(1)]. [More]
The Castle Doctrine law gives Ohioans the right to use lethal force to protect their person and property...[More]No it does not, either, "Authorized Journalist" Denise G. Callahan, although I don't expect you to understand why I'm taking exception.
We can only say that situations in which "seconds count" occur more in gun advocates' imaginations than in reality. We live in a community that is, by and large, safe and law-abiding, with a populace that is mostly courteous and restrained. The larger danger is from accidental shootings. [More]Here are the unsolved Winston-Salem homicides.
Brian Terry, Jesus Diaz, Dakota Meyer: Justice in 2012?Excellent work, Kathleen Millar, that helps us better understand the environment in which we proceed.
