Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor--and Whereas both Houses of Congress have by their Joint Committee requested me "to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness."
...Given under my hand at the City of New York the third day of October in the year of our Lord 1789.
Go. Washington
Today, we accept the
ACLU's version of the "wall of separation" as gospel. It was never the intent of the Founders to snuff out all religious expression in the public forum, but to instead abolish a national compulsory religion, such as was exemplified by the Church of England.
There's a huge difference. Note Washington "recommends." He doesn't mandate.
Now we've strayed so far that American schools are celebrating
"winter festival" instead of "Christmas," so as not to offend complaining Muslims.
Seeing as how the political left is so profoundly and demonstrably wrong in their interpretation of the First Amendment, why would we also accept
their version of the Second?
And why would some wish to separate a people from their history, their tradition and their birthright? Might there be a purpose in doing so, and would anyone benefit from it?
Who?