My personal opinion is that this is a storm in a teacup, and Codrea needs to take a Valium or something.
Why, Kim?
I didn't invent the guns in space angle, I merely reported it, and I even commented on how stated
administration policy could be used to establish regulations without invoking
any change in Second Amendment interpretation. If they had simply done this, not many gun owners would have even noticed the new regs, let alone protested.
As far as the "collective rights" issue goes, you just essentially agreed with me, admitting "we gunnies are going to get upset about this" and referring to the new language as "lunacy."
I've addressed the speculation that it may be just a bureaucratic oversight
here, but regardless--since the function of government is essentially to protect our rights-- such sloppiness, if that's what it is, amounts to irresponsible, and some would say, criminal negligence when one of the keystone rights is involved.
If it's truly "a storm in a teacup," then there's no reason why the administration shouldn't order the language they approved for publication in the Federal Register rescinded, and the office of the president shouldn't publicly reaffirm it's commitment to an "individual rights" interpretation.
I have a way to find out, and it'll only take a minute--probably less than a tenth of the time it took to write commentary with a conclusion telling people I need to take a Valium. Why not just
send the White House an email on the topic and find out? If it's no big deal, they should be happy to make everything all right. Right?
I know it would sure settle
me down, hysterical little Cassandra that I am.