Iceland was a real-world example which privately produced more peace than the US has had, for longer than the US has existed...[More]
The comments in this thread went a bit far afield, and are buried in a post that is days old, and therefore not likely to be read.
How does a society with no "government" protect itself from invaders? I'm given the example of tenth to thirteenth century Iceland.
My read on that: we're talking a non-technological society that most of the world at the time didn't even know about, let alone have the means or the incentive to invade. It was a homogeneous culture--the same language, tradition, religion, mores, culture, history...
Let's examine the time and conditions in which we live.
I don't expect to resolve the anarchist/libertarianist vs. Constitutionalist debate here. I just wanted to make this dialog available for readers here to engage in.
Please read the linked comment thread before engaging, and then leave comments here (I'm turning them off in the older post so that we can move the discussion here).
And please--I started out my dialog with this poster with the understanding that name-calling would not be tolerated. Let's focus on light, not heat.