This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I never have understood why some in the pro-gun camp give Winkler the time of day, let alone invite him to address their gatherings. [More]
2 comments:
Crotalus
said...
It just hit me, that saying "well regulated" means "controlled by the state" means that the state would be in control of the militia's guns Couple that thinking with"shall not be infringe" makes the 2A self-contradictory So that cannot be true about "well regulated"
"Well regulated" meaning "controlled by government actors" has nothing to do with terminology in use at the time of the writing if the Constitution.
It's only because of the idiocy of Congress eschewing its duty and allowing agencies to adopt their own "regulations" regarding how the law is enforced that progressives "believe" that nonsense.
It's much more likely (a fact) that "well regulated" is more akin to "regulated" meaning, for instance, the regulation firearm is one in common usage at the time, is well maintained, sighted in, and is primarily for a military purpose.
Meaning that a modern military firearm in common usage, including ammunition and accoutrements, which firearms and associated necessities are in good repair and ready for action, is being used, in general, by all Militia, at the time.
That's just something the anti's aren't willing to deal with, as it points to the EBR's which terrify them so.
2 comments:
It just hit me, that saying "well regulated" means "controlled by the state" means that the state would be in control of the militia's guns Couple that thinking with"shall not be infringe" makes the 2A self-contradictory So that cannot be true about "well regulated"
"Well regulated" meaning "controlled by government actors" has nothing to do with terminology in use at the time of the writing if the Constitution.
It's only because of the idiocy of Congress eschewing its duty and allowing agencies to adopt their own "regulations" regarding how the law is enforced that progressives "believe" that nonsense.
It's much more likely (a fact) that "well regulated" is more akin to "regulated" meaning, for instance, the regulation firearm is one in common usage at the time, is well maintained, sighted in, and is primarily for a military purpose.
Meaning that a modern military firearm in common usage, including ammunition and accoutrements, which firearms and associated necessities are in good repair and ready for action, is being used, in general, by all Militia, at the time.
That's just something the anti's aren't willing to deal with, as it points to the EBR's which terrify them so.
Post a Comment