The ruling did not overturn the ban but rejected arguments invoked by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, in which judges ruled that stun guns were not protected under the Second Amendment because they “were not in common use at the time of the Second Amendment’s enactment.” [More]In other words, the treasonous robed PsOS would ban everything developed after.
Regulars here recognize lawyer Stamboulieh's name, right?
[Via Len Savage]
2 comments:
What would they do if some people started defending themselves with flintlock pistols? Those were around when the Constitution was ratified.
You laugh, but in Massachusetts. black powder firearms are exempt from most (possibly all) of their licensing and possession laws (not the trigger lock laws, however: http://www.massnews.com/past_issues/2000/Politics/pol70.htm).
Post a Comment