In an unjust decision that runs counter to both the precedent-setting Heller and McDonald rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday ruled that the Second Amendment does not protect an individual right to carry a firearm in public—either openly or concealed. [More]
Well, that certainly runs counter to founding intent and makes tyrannical intent clear.
We've talked about George Young before.
2 comments:
How many of these inconsistencies will pile up before Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett muster enough courage to roll over Roberts?
Any bets?
“We can find no general right to carry arms into the public square for self-defense.” From the Firearm News article, that is a direct quote from the 9th circuit.
Out of curiosity I looked up the term "bear"- as in to keep and bear arms. The first synonym I found to explain the word "bear" was CARRY. The 9th claims you have no right to "carry" arms in public. So, I'm to assume the 9th doesn't understand the English language?
Post a Comment