CALIFORNIA FORCED TO COMPLY IN SHARP v. BECERRA RIFLE REGISTRATION CASE [More]
WarOnGuns Correspondent SamAdams1776 is not sharing in the enthusiasm and sends this response:
[Open in new tab to enlarge]
I typically base my concerns on core purpose grounds.
3 comments:
"a botched computer program"
Hmmm...
Something about that sounds familiar.
Let me get this straig
State demands registration.
State fubars registration system an schedule.
2A support group gives state extra time to get affected citizens to comply?
WTF?
I appreciate reader SamAdams1776 and the contract law approach. But the fact is, SCOTUS and any lower court will not invalidate the nation's gun laws by a single ruling. Judges are also politicians, unfortunately. We KNOW that gun laws are unlawful, but no court is going to throw them all out. Hell, we couldn't even get SCOTUS to hear a case brought by multiple states attorneys-general on an obviously fraudulent, rigged Presidential election. Do you really think they will throw out NFA and GCA '68? They won't even enforce the transportation provisions of FOPA that fail to protect armed travelers passing through NY and NJ. Yours truly has driven his gun collection through said hellholes on four different occasions with his heart in his throat, because I was moving to/from New England. A flat tire, or traffic accident and I'd be writing this from the pen. Let's fix THAT first.
Post a Comment