“The federal government announced the largest medical fraud settlement in U.S. history" ... Pfizer in 2009 agreed to “plead guilty to a felony violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.” [More]
So the question here seems to be: Would you let a self-confessed medical fraud inject you and your loved ones with an untested-over-the-long-term chemical concoction for which you have no legal recourse from side-effects when their assurance boils down to "Trust us"? And the goal is every person on the planet? And the entire DSM/social media oligopoly is set up to cancel those questioning and expressing concerns...?
The other thing I find curious is why pharmacies/supermarkets across the land are set up to administer the "vaccine" but no effort was made first to set up mass testing and see who actually registers positive for the virus. Isn't knowing who has it, and especially who is asymptomatic, relevant?
[Via Alan D]
2 comments:
"Is it relevant?"
What a dumb-ass question.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Sounds like Double Secret Probation.
Remember, corporations are people so.... Pfizer is a prohibited person
Post a Comment