This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
On the one hand, waiting on hold for 30 minutes during an emergent -- and possibly violent -- situation is ridiculous. The caller in the recording has a legitimate grievance.
On the other hand, having worked in call centers, I can say the reps, whether it's a 9-1-1 dispatcher or a tech support guru, have ZERO control over the calls coming in. That's someone else's doing. If 9-1-1 gets inundated with calls -- fireworks on July 4th, DUIs on New Year's and St. Patrick's Day, etc. -- the 9-1-1 center really doesn't have any control over that. The dispatcher in the recording isn't wrong, either.
But on the shooting hand, holidays like July 4th almost always come with a lot of extra calls, and if anyone is paying attention to the metrics, they know it. It would take almost no effort to schedule higher staffing levels weeks or months in advance of those days. Make it an "all hands on deck" situation.
Also, they should be able to put an outgoing message saying they are aware of a large number of potentially-illegal fireworks being used, and direct fireworks calls to the non-emergency line unless there's a fire or injury. Every caller would hear this message.
I'm not sure who could be "held accountable" for the long wait times -- certainly not the dispatchers, who are almost certainly doing the best they can! -- but IMHO, an outgoing message and increased staffing is about all they can do. Unless a supervisor somewhere dropped the ball on those things, there's not much else to be done.
1 comment:
On the one hand, waiting on hold for 30 minutes during an emergent -- and possibly violent -- situation is ridiculous. The caller in the recording has a legitimate grievance.
On the other hand, having worked in call centers, I can say the reps, whether it's a 9-1-1 dispatcher or a tech support guru, have ZERO control over the calls coming in. That's someone else's doing. If 9-1-1 gets inundated with calls -- fireworks on July 4th, DUIs on New Year's and St. Patrick's Day, etc. -- the 9-1-1 center really doesn't have any control over that. The dispatcher in the recording isn't wrong, either.
But on the shooting hand, holidays like July 4th almost always come with a lot of extra calls, and if anyone is paying attention to the metrics, they know it. It would take almost no effort to schedule higher staffing levels weeks or months in advance of those days. Make it an "all hands on deck" situation.
Also, they should be able to put an outgoing message saying they are aware of a large number of potentially-illegal fireworks being used, and direct fireworks calls to the non-emergency line unless there's a fire or injury. Every caller would hear this message.
I'm not sure who could be "held accountable" for the long wait times -- certainly not the dispatchers, who are almost certainly doing the best they can! -- but IMHO, an outgoing message and increased staffing is about all they can do. Unless a supervisor somewhere dropped the ball on those things, there's not much else to be done.
Post a Comment