WATCH: Dirty Prosecutors In Rittenhouse Trial Hid Exculpatory Evidence, Mistrial With Prejudice? [More]
What's keeping the jury from coming back with an immediate "Not guilty on all counts" verdict, and will they find a way to screw it all up?
And is everybody ready for the DOJ to step in with Revenge Plan B if the kid walks?
[Via Mack H]
And tangentially related:The upcoming verdict in Kyle Rittenhouse’s murder trial for shooting three men during street unrest in Wisconsin comes against a backdrop of deep political divisions and expanded access to guns in the United States – factors that some fear could lead to more dangerous encounters.
Pro tip: Don't chase us, assault us, hit us with skateboards, and point guns at us and you'll be fine.
[Via Roger J]
5 comments:
Dying to watch this, but the link is trash...
The previously unidentified "jump kick man" has allegedly been identified. Read on to realize what a piece of work he is and that he is no stranger to the Rittenhouse prosecutors:
https://www.wisconsinrightnow.com/2021/11/16/maurice-freeland-jump-kick-man/
https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1460982508128980999
http://inmate.kenoshajs.org/NewWorld.InmateInquiry/kenosha/Inmate/Detail/-29851
My apologies - I omitted this:
https://6park.news/wisconsin/maurice-freeland-suspected-of-being-jump-kick-man.html
Jury is taking way too long to indicate acquittal.
Methinks they're looking for a few thin threads on which to find him guilty of 'something', 'anything' in hopes of saving themselves from the mob.
Perhaps a fatal flaw from the judge is NOT sequestering the jury.
When a jury is sequestered, they would rather go home sooner than later.
There is no sense of urgency here.
Post a Comment