Project Safe Neighborhoods is training cops to spot people keeping and bearing arms. Even those minding their own business, as well as those who live in areas where the government thinks it has the authority to issue permits--and then doesn't.
From the International Association of Chiefs of Police:
"Courses offered through PSNET and other PSN related trainings:
"Characteristics of Armed Persons
"This session is designed to aid law enforcement officers in identifying persons who are unlawfully carrying concealed firearms. Based on thoughtful conclusions drawn from fundamental, common sense observations, this training will enable officers to make clear observations and distinctions of some of the more common characteristics demonstrated by individuals who carry concealed firearms. The identification of offenders carrying concealed weapons, before the weapons are used, can be essential to the prevention of violent crimes."
And guess who "fully supports" PSN?
"'The NRA and our over four million members fully support the Justice Department's Project Safe Neighborhoods,' said National Rifle Association spokeswoman Kelly Whitley. Whitley said the project, which includes the grant for additional prosecutors, was based on a similar project in Richmond, Va., where violent crime dropped 70 percent in two years."
Kelly, that's simply not true. I'm an NRA Life Member. I don't support this unconstitutional outrage.
And funny thing about Richmond: Their murder rate is climbing while national numbers decline.
"The project also is popular with gun control proponents."
What, the LaPierre Center to Prevent Gun Violence, formerly National Rifle Control, Inc., isn't considered one?
Guess who else is on the PSN bandwagon?
"'We think that Project Safe Neighborhoods is a step in the right direction,' said Amy Stilwell, spokeswoman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence."
See that, NRA management? "A step." As in the journey isn't completed.
Note to the Fairfax suits. Gun control doesn't work. You really ought to have faith in your own findings.
That is, assuming you're not just talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Again.
Wednesday, May 11, 2005
Tuesday, May 10, 2005
"It is Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool…
...than open one's mouth and remove all doubt."
Somebody ought to let Calvin Floyd in on that.
“If scientists can send a radio signal to a robot on Mars or on a moon of a more distant planet to order its movement,” he asks, “then why don't we require small-arms and rifle manufacturers to install chips right into the grips and stocks of weapons that will radiate a detectable signal?”
Because it’s a monumentally stupid idea, Calvin. But I’m sure the politicians and cud chewers will love it.
[Use BugMeNot to bypass site registration. Thanks to KABA Newslinks.]
Somebody ought to let Calvin Floyd in on that.
“If scientists can send a radio signal to a robot on Mars or on a moon of a more distant planet to order its movement,” he asks, “then why don't we require small-arms and rifle manufacturers to install chips right into the grips and stocks of weapons that will radiate a detectable signal?”
Because it’s a monumentally stupid idea, Calvin. But I’m sure the politicians and cud chewers will love it.
[Use BugMeNot to bypass site registration. Thanks to KABA Newslinks.]
Why Not Just Let the Burglars Select Our Watchdogs?
"Chris Simcox, the owner and publisher of Arizona's Tombstone Tumbleweed and a co-founder of the Minuteman Project, says he was denied entry to a press conference with Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff."
What have we been saying about the government deciding who qualifies to be a journalist?
What have we been saying about the government deciding who qualifies to be a journalist?
Monday, May 09, 2005
The New McCarthyism
"Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY) today introduced legislation to prevent individuals convicted of felonies in foreign countries from purchasing firearms in the U.S...McCarthy's bill amends current law to state that a person "convicted in any court, including any foreign court, of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year" shall not be able to possess a firearm...McCarthy's bill allows the courts to determine the validity of foreign convictions in disputed cases. 'This clause will protect individuals convicted in courts of questionable jurisdiction or legitimacy,' said McCarthy."
Let's see, China, where selling Bibles will get you a felony conviction, is on our favored nations list, so their jurisdiction must be legitimate.
It seems to me the delegated powers relating to Congress and the courts have already been defined--not that we'd expect the distinguished representative from New York to read the Constitution.
Why are we letting rapists and murderers into the country might be a better issue to address.
[via KABA Newslinks]
Let's see, China, where selling Bibles will get you a felony conviction, is on our favored nations list, so their jurisdiction must be legitimate.
It seems to me the delegated powers relating to Congress and the courts have already been defined--not that we'd expect the distinguished representative from New York to read the Constitution.
Why are we letting rapists and murderers into the country might be a better issue to address.
[via KABA Newslinks]
Black Arrow Update
Fran Tully at Free West is not pleased with Laissez Faire Books.
Meanwhile, Claire Wolfe leads us to J.D. Tuccille’s review of The Black Arrow.
Meanwhile, Claire Wolfe leads us to J.D. Tuccille’s review of The Black Arrow.
Sunday, May 08, 2005
Black Arrow Blues
End the War on Freedom points us to an open letter to Laissez Faire Books from Sunni Maravillosa.
Seems they don’t want to carry Vin Suprynowicz’s “The Black Arrow,” which is their right. But their reasons are laughable.
LFB’s Kathleen Hiserodt cites her primary motive:
“[W]e are concerned about offending our customers with what we see as the gratuitous vulgar sexual content. I couldn't see any good reason for including it, and I think it makes the book inappropriate for a significant segment of our market.”
In a follow-up, Ms. Hiserodt notes: “[T]he sexual content that I found offensive had absolutely nothing to do with freedom or pro-creation. It was completely centered around slavery, extortion, and degradation.”
Umm, wouldn’t that mean it wasn’t “gratuitous”?
I’m not that comfortable with graphic sexual descriptions, either, but when I saw what Vin was doing—reserving his most “vulgar” narratives for scenes involving coercion and submission to state authority figures—it made sense. And that means the uncomfortable emotions the sexual scenes evoked in me did their job, and proved Vin’s skill as a fiction writer.
I also can’t seem to find “Unintended Consequences” at LFB. Oh, that’s right, John Ross included some of that “gratuitous vulgar sexual content.”
Well, if they want to create a niche market for liberty activists and then leave out two of the most important liberty novels targeted at that niche, I guess it’s their business.
“Yes, LFB could carry it and issue explicit warnings about the content,” Hiserodt explains. “We seriously considered doing just that. On the other hand, we have many other books that we can endorse wholeheartedly. Why is this book so important or unique that it is worth spending extra space (taken away from other books we could offer or describe in greater detail) to warn people that this book might be something they don't really want?”
Yeah, I guess putting the words “WARNING-BOOK CONTAINS GRAPHIC SEXUAL SITUATIONS” or some such on their ads would really be an extreme effort. Why, their customers might actually have to make a free choice! As to why this “book [is] so important or unique,” let’s look through the rest of the LFB catalog. Besides this and the absent UC, which other novels do they carry that provide graphic descriptions of underground liberty fighters targeting corrupt American government officials?
“If I were given free reign to edit the book (I wasn't asked),” Hiserodt continues, “I do think there is a book in there that LFB would love to carry.”
Thank God she wasn’t asked. Vin doesn’t need someone who doesn’t even understand that the term is “free rein,” (as in a rider letting the horse choose the way—giving unrestricted liberty to—in other words, “laissez faire”) as opposed to “free reign” (apparently her freedom to rule), tampering with his masterpiece.
As a side note, Vin, if this somehow comes to your attention, please consider this from a fan: Dvorak’s Symphony in E Minor, “From the New World” (the Berlin Philharmonic version)—I know you have all kinds of rock ‘n roll in the book, but for the opening music, I can’t think of a better theme for The Black Arrow when it finally gets the recognition it deserves and is made into a movie.
One more comment: I note the BA site says it still has some of its signed leather bound inventory left. What the hell is wrong with people? Why didn’t this sell out two months ago? Go out and buy this book. Jesus—our side—talk, talk, talk.
Support?
With money?
[Insert excuse here]
And then we bitch about domination of the media.
Seems they don’t want to carry Vin Suprynowicz’s “The Black Arrow,” which is their right. But their reasons are laughable.
LFB’s Kathleen Hiserodt cites her primary motive:
“[W]e are concerned about offending our customers with what we see as the gratuitous vulgar sexual content. I couldn't see any good reason for including it, and I think it makes the book inappropriate for a significant segment of our market.”
In a follow-up, Ms. Hiserodt notes: “[T]he sexual content that I found offensive had absolutely nothing to do with freedom or pro-creation. It was completely centered around slavery, extortion, and degradation.”
Umm, wouldn’t that mean it wasn’t “gratuitous”?
I’m not that comfortable with graphic sexual descriptions, either, but when I saw what Vin was doing—reserving his most “vulgar” narratives for scenes involving coercion and submission to state authority figures—it made sense. And that means the uncomfortable emotions the sexual scenes evoked in me did their job, and proved Vin’s skill as a fiction writer.
I also can’t seem to find “Unintended Consequences” at LFB. Oh, that’s right, John Ross included some of that “gratuitous vulgar sexual content.”
Well, if they want to create a niche market for liberty activists and then leave out two of the most important liberty novels targeted at that niche, I guess it’s their business.
“Yes, LFB could carry it and issue explicit warnings about the content,” Hiserodt explains. “We seriously considered doing just that. On the other hand, we have many other books that we can endorse wholeheartedly. Why is this book so important or unique that it is worth spending extra space (taken away from other books we could offer or describe in greater detail) to warn people that this book might be something they don't really want?”
Yeah, I guess putting the words “WARNING-BOOK CONTAINS GRAPHIC SEXUAL SITUATIONS” or some such on their ads would really be an extreme effort. Why, their customers might actually have to make a free choice! As to why this “book [is] so important or unique,” let’s look through the rest of the LFB catalog. Besides this and the absent UC, which other novels do they carry that provide graphic descriptions of underground liberty fighters targeting corrupt American government officials?
“If I were given free reign to edit the book (I wasn't asked),” Hiserodt continues, “I do think there is a book in there that LFB would love to carry.”
Thank God she wasn’t asked. Vin doesn’t need someone who doesn’t even understand that the term is “free rein,” (as in a rider letting the horse choose the way—giving unrestricted liberty to—in other words, “laissez faire”) as opposed to “free reign” (apparently her freedom to rule), tampering with his masterpiece.
As a side note, Vin, if this somehow comes to your attention, please consider this from a fan: Dvorak’s Symphony in E Minor, “From the New World” (the Berlin Philharmonic version)—I know you have all kinds of rock ‘n roll in the book, but for the opening music, I can’t think of a better theme for The Black Arrow when it finally gets the recognition it deserves and is made into a movie.
One more comment: I note the BA site says it still has some of its signed leather bound inventory left. What the hell is wrong with people? Why didn’t this sell out two months ago? Go out and buy this book. Jesus—our side—talk, talk, talk.
Support?
With money?
[Insert excuse here]
And then we bitch about domination of the media.
A Mothers' Day Wish...
...for all you mothers out there, guaranteed by the policies promoted by the Brady Campaign/Million Mom March.
A Reason Debate
I've rarely read such unmitigated horse manure--especially the suggestions from those ostensibly on "our" side.
Kates, in particular, continues to be a disappointment.
The eggheads can keep debating. When the debate descends from the ivory tower, it won't be their opinions that count.
Never give up. Never give in.
Kates, in particular, continues to be a disappointment.
The eggheads can keep debating. When the debate descends from the ivory tower, it won't be their opinions that count.
Never give up. Never give in.
Saturday, May 07, 2005
Fish Or Man Update
Guilty.
"In picking the jury the prosecutor removed the three that admitted to being pro-second amendment."
Update update:
"Jury Instruction No. 5"
"In picking the jury the prosecutor removed the three that admitted to being pro-second amendment."
Update update:
"Jury Instruction No. 5"
“Imaging a Safer World”
After clicking on the headline link, scroll down and select "[Demonstration]"
"May 6, 2005 08:20 - With 45 ft range, BIS-WDS™ Prime uses passive millimeter wave sensor technology to detect guns, knives, or bombs of metal, plastic, or composite construction. Weapons Detection System (WDS) consists of millimeter wave camera combined with video camera and algorithm software that interfaces to other security devices/networks. Capable of identifying up to 50 threats simultaneously, system produces electronic alarm when suspicious item is detected."
Well, we knew THIS was coming.
A Lockheed Martin joint venture, eh? “The single largest contractor to the United States Federal Government.” Figures.
In other words, profits on cost-plus contracts paid for by We the People are funneled into R&D for spinoff ventures that will be used to further captivate us.
Here are the capitalists who are selling the rope.
Naturally, former War on Drugs “czar” (notice they never say “fuhrer”?) Barry McCaffrey is part of the team. How could we build a Brave New World without him?
Time to work on creative ways to defeat this obscenity against privacy and liberty…
Any bets that Brijot’s legal counsel would scream the loudest about properly executed warrants should a raid for financial/time reporting/inventory records occur?
Any bets they'd cite the following in their complaint?
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
[Thanks to KABA Newslinks for the tip.]
"May 6, 2005 08:20 - With 45 ft range, BIS-WDS™ Prime uses passive millimeter wave sensor technology to detect guns, knives, or bombs of metal, plastic, or composite construction. Weapons Detection System (WDS) consists of millimeter wave camera combined with video camera and algorithm software that interfaces to other security devices/networks. Capable of identifying up to 50 threats simultaneously, system produces electronic alarm when suspicious item is detected."
Well, we knew THIS was coming.
A Lockheed Martin joint venture, eh? “The single largest contractor to the United States Federal Government.” Figures.
In other words, profits on cost-plus contracts paid for by We the People are funneled into R&D for spinoff ventures that will be used to further captivate us.
Here are the capitalists who are selling the rope.
Naturally, former War on Drugs “czar” (notice they never say “fuhrer”?) Barry McCaffrey is part of the team. How could we build a Brave New World without him?
Time to work on creative ways to defeat this obscenity against privacy and liberty…
Any bets that Brijot’s legal counsel would scream the loudest about properly executed warrants should a raid for financial/time reporting/inventory records occur?
Any bets they'd cite the following in their complaint?
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
[Thanks to KABA Newslinks for the tip.]
A Call to Action
"[E]ven though I am not an American, I care about gun rights and freedom. I believe, America is going to be the death knell of the global gun control movement, and if we can kill gun control in America, it will eventually collapse in every major democracy.
"And now, for action. This year, the House of Representatives and the Senate is composed of a more pro-gun body than ever. This means we have a real shot at passing HR-1703 - Second Amendment Protection Act 2005. It is a bill whose main target is to eliminate the sporting purpose requirement from Federal law, eliminating such things as the import ban and the ATF-introduced ban on certain shotguns in one 'fell swoop', further securing the argument that 'the guns are not for hunting' in law."
So writes MicroBalrog. Did you get that? He's not an American. He lives in Israel. But he's doing more to protect American gun rights than most domestic gun owners--by a long shot.
People who have things given to them, that would be us, too often don't appreciate what they've inherited. Sometimes it takes an observer to see things from outside to tell us we need to act.
UPDATE:
He's posted a more detailed call to action here.
"And now, for action. This year, the House of Representatives and the Senate is composed of a more pro-gun body than ever. This means we have a real shot at passing HR-1703 - Second Amendment Protection Act 2005. It is a bill whose main target is to eliminate the sporting purpose requirement from Federal law, eliminating such things as the import ban and the ATF-introduced ban on certain shotguns in one 'fell swoop', further securing the argument that 'the guns are not for hunting' in law."
So writes MicroBalrog. Did you get that? He's not an American. He lives in Israel. But he's doing more to protect American gun rights than most domestic gun owners--by a long shot.
People who have things given to them, that would be us, too often don't appreciate what they've inherited. Sometimes it takes an observer to see things from outside to tell us we need to act.
UPDATE:
He's posted a more detailed call to action here.
Friday, May 06, 2005
Feelings, Nothing More than Feelings
As the ninnies who bleat for government destruction of our rights have consistently demonstrated, it’s not about results. Commentator Martha Blume, in Chesapeake’s Bay Weekly calls for a Constitutional amendment: “The right of the people to feel safe from gun violence in their homes, neighborhoods, schools, places of worship, employment, on the streets and in any other public places shall not be infringed.”
Like the love song says, it’s about “Feelings, nothing more than feelings ... ”
My Rights Watch column for the May issue of GUNS Magazine is now online.
Like the love song says, it’s about “Feelings, nothing more than feelings ... ”
My Rights Watch column for the May issue of GUNS Magazine is now online.
A Slap on the Wrist
The Brady Campaign was fined $12K for making illegal campaign contributions "to various Democratic candidates."
$12K for this slick, well-financed, legally and politically connected, media-heralded national organization--but when Russ Howard, who put together a grassroots effort on a shoestring budget, tried to protect the names of supporters (after credible threats were made), he got steamrolled with the largest adminstrative fine in California history.
The rich anti-gunners get a slap on the wrist that can be covered from one donation by one of its Hollywood benefactors. The idealistic citizen who steps forward to protect gun rights has his life destroyed.
Yeah, that's the America patriots fought and died for.
If you're not aware of Russ Howard's story, you should be.
Once you are aware, he could really use some help with legal fees.
UPDATE:
David Hardy reminds us: "A couple of years ago, Brady was assessed $26,000 for violating the campaign reporting rules."
So they're REPEAT OFFENDERS.
That makes the disparity with Russ Howard's case all the more outrageous and evil.
$12K for this slick, well-financed, legally and politically connected, media-heralded national organization--but when Russ Howard, who put together a grassroots effort on a shoestring budget, tried to protect the names of supporters (after credible threats were made), he got steamrolled with the largest adminstrative fine in California history.
The rich anti-gunners get a slap on the wrist that can be covered from one donation by one of its Hollywood benefactors. The idealistic citizen who steps forward to protect gun rights has his life destroyed.
Yeah, that's the America patriots fought and died for.
If you're not aware of Russ Howard's story, you should be.
Once you are aware, he could really use some help with legal fees.
UPDATE:
David Hardy reminds us: "A couple of years ago, Brady was assessed $26,000 for violating the campaign reporting rules."
So they're REPEAT OFFENDERS.
That makes the disparity with Russ Howard's case all the more outrageous and evil.
Nostalgia and Magazine Blogging
the ten ring goes into more detail on the 50-year old issue of GUNS Magazine featured Wednesday on this site.
Pity Denise lost her original draft in a Blogger glitch, but this reconstruction of highlights is excellent.
Pity Denise lost her original draft in a Blogger glitch, but this reconstruction of highlights is excellent.
Thursday, May 05, 2005
California Bans Internet Use?
"The bill by Sen. Debra Bowen, D-Redondo Beach, which now moves to the Assembly, would prohibit use of computer-assisted hunting sites, bar such sites from operating in California and prohibit the importation or exportation of any animal or part of an animal killed using computer-assisted hunting."
Look, I'm not a hunter. I also happent to think that Internet hunting is ridiculous. But if you want to do it, that ain't my call.
What worries me is, how are they gonna know? Set up some sort of monitoring for all internet traffic? Block it at the ISP? What else will they intercept or block?
Or is this, as I suspect, simply more posturing calculated to gin up public hostility to gun owners by exploiting the emotions stirred up by a "virtually" non-existent "problem"?
I'll tell you one thing--if I belonged to the California Sportsmen's Association, Safari Club International or the Outdoor Sportsman's Coalition of California, all of which support this nonsense, I'd quit and never send them another cent.
Talk about useful idiots.
Look, I'm not a hunter. I also happent to think that Internet hunting is ridiculous. But if you want to do it, that ain't my call.
What worries me is, how are they gonna know? Set up some sort of monitoring for all internet traffic? Block it at the ISP? What else will they intercept or block?
Or is this, as I suspect, simply more posturing calculated to gin up public hostility to gun owners by exploiting the emotions stirred up by a "virtually" non-existent "problem"?
I'll tell you one thing--if I belonged to the California Sportsmen's Association, Safari Club International or the Outdoor Sportsman's Coalition of California, all of which support this nonsense, I'd quit and never send them another cent.
Talk about useful idiots.
The Perfect Mothers' Day Gift...
Jennifer Freeman of Liberty Belles tells us what that is.
Assuming, of course, that Mom isn't one in a "Million."
Assuming, of course, that Mom isn't one in a "Million."
Ve Haff Vays of Making You Talk…
…even if you don’t.
“Scientists from Japan and the United States have figured out how to read a person's mind by remotely measuring brain activity, extracting information of which the subject is not even aware. Science fiction? No. It's real.”
I got this from KABA Newslinks—a daily stop that ought to be part of every gun owner’s routine. I often enjoy the remarks posted by readers more than the story they’re commenting on.
As with all technological developments, including guns, this will be used for good or ill. It’s the “ill” part that worries me.
“Scientists from Japan and the United States have figured out how to read a person's mind by remotely measuring brain activity, extracting information of which the subject is not even aware. Science fiction? No. It's real.”
I got this from KABA Newslinks—a daily stop that ought to be part of every gun owner’s routine. I often enjoy the remarks posted by readers more than the story they’re commenting on.
As with all technological developments, including guns, this will be used for good or ill. It’s the “ill” part that worries me.
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
GUNS Magazine: May 1955 Issue
"The Legend of Davy Crockett"
"The Scotch Pistol Mystery"
"A Six Shooter for TV Cowboys"
What's not to like? And it's free!
The May 1955 issue of GUNS Magazine is now online in .pdf format.
Inherit the Windbag
"Sounds like the Old West is returning to the Sunshine State!" Ron Reagan intros in his MSNBC discussion panel on Florida's new "stand your ground" law.
Ron mugs. Ron grimaces. Ron laughs at his own wit ("Snarf, snarf, snarf!").
Ron argues that the average person doesn't have the training or the judgment or the intelligence that police do, to know when it's appropriate to use lethal force.
Ron doesn't think a regular person would have time to react appropriately to an attack. Interestingly, Ron's guest and fellow citizen disarmament fanatic, Richard Aborn, argues just the opposite--he's against Florida's bill because he thinks people need to deliberate and cogitate and think about consequences and weigh and evaluate and think some more before deciding to consider responding to an immediate, life-endangering threat.
Ron speculates that if he pulled a knife on a woman and she responded by retrieving a gun instead of a wallet from her purse, he could take it away and use it against her.
I'm sure I could find some people who would love to see him try. Hey Ron, any time you want to give a public demonstration, have your people call my people.
"By the way, you're not packin' heat are ya?" Ron asks his other guest, CCRKBA's Alan Gottlieb. "Because if I ask you a threatening question I don't want you drawing down on me! Snarf, snarf, snarf!"
Yeah, maintain the bigoted lie that peaceable gun owners are prone to violence when they don't get their way. Hopefully, in the future, now that he has the benefit of hindsight for this sort of question, Alan will use it as an opportunity to correct the record and educate the viewers instead of laughing along with such catty insults.
"Untrained amateurs are notoriously bad at recognizing threats and responding to them with a cool head," Ron claims with authority. "The last thing we want is someone who's never been in this sort of situation before waving a gun around firing off rounds."
Right, Ron. Tell these people they were wrong.
"Hey everybody," Ron concludes, "I love to say this when we do this sort of segment. Keep your powder dry. Snarf, snarf, snarf!"
What a talentless moron. What a prime example of how inheriting a famous name puts totally unworthy people in the spotlight.
So, Ron, how does it feel to be MSNBC's answer to Paris Hilton? Snarf, snarf, snarf!
Ron mugs. Ron grimaces. Ron laughs at his own wit ("Snarf, snarf, snarf!").
Ron argues that the average person doesn't have the training or the judgment or the intelligence that police do, to know when it's appropriate to use lethal force.
Ron doesn't think a regular person would have time to react appropriately to an attack. Interestingly, Ron's guest and fellow citizen disarmament fanatic, Richard Aborn, argues just the opposite--he's against Florida's bill because he thinks people need to deliberate and cogitate and think about consequences and weigh and evaluate and think some more before deciding to consider responding to an immediate, life-endangering threat.
Ron speculates that if he pulled a knife on a woman and she responded by retrieving a gun instead of a wallet from her purse, he could take it away and use it against her.
I'm sure I could find some people who would love to see him try. Hey Ron, any time you want to give a public demonstration, have your people call my people.
"By the way, you're not packin' heat are ya?" Ron asks his other guest, CCRKBA's Alan Gottlieb. "Because if I ask you a threatening question I don't want you drawing down on me! Snarf, snarf, snarf!"
Yeah, maintain the bigoted lie that peaceable gun owners are prone to violence when they don't get their way. Hopefully, in the future, now that he has the benefit of hindsight for this sort of question, Alan will use it as an opportunity to correct the record and educate the viewers instead of laughing along with such catty insults.
"Untrained amateurs are notoriously bad at recognizing threats and responding to them with a cool head," Ron claims with authority. "The last thing we want is someone who's never been in this sort of situation before waving a gun around firing off rounds."
Right, Ron. Tell these people they were wrong.
"Hey everybody," Ron concludes, "I love to say this when we do this sort of segment. Keep your powder dry. Snarf, snarf, snarf!"
What a talentless moron. What a prime example of how inheriting a famous name puts totally unworthy people in the spotlight.
So, Ron, how does it feel to be MSNBC's answer to Paris Hilton? Snarf, snarf, snarf!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)