This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
Six minutes is a pretty good response time. But, you know, chronology matters. The principals of preemptive justice suggest that it would have been better to make the call seven minutes earlier. This sounds ludicrous, but no more so than pointing out that the Cheshire Duo had no prior violent crime convictions, or that every psych evaluation is a vector for future violent criminal activity.
So will the authoritarians pour from the cracks to point out that had he been decapitated when he performed his first crime as a juvenile, this never would have happened? Will the bleeding hearts praise the sentencing and demand more rehabilitation? Perhaps the safety nannies will demand gun-free zone signs posted on all residences in Palm Beach, and the word "gun" removed from all literature? Since background checks didn't remove this man's will to do crime, or prevent him from getting a weapon, perhaps the NRA would consider lobbying to include all government records in NICS for people named "Anthony"? Was the weapon painted black? Did it have a flash supressor, folding stock, high-cap magazine or a pistol grip? Maybe there needs to be a black market Form 4473 with the additional question: "Are you going to shoot your girlfriend in the face with this weapon?"
Sorry, but I'm so sick of the stupidity and waste created by people would wouldn't know which end the bullet comes out of, and would probably foul their underwear if someone discharged an air gun 500 feet away. The threat of violence doesn't demand disarmament, and it doesn't demand a bureaucratic process, it demands the fastest and deadliest possible response by the potential victim. Now they have to spend thousands of dollars to hunt down this bastard, and try his crime in a court, all while he may commit more crimes to evade capture. Wouldn't it have been more efficient to simply stop him in the act?
1 comment:
Six minutes is a pretty good response time. But, you know, chronology matters. The principals of preemptive justice suggest that it would have been better to make the call seven minutes earlier. This sounds ludicrous, but no more so than pointing out that the Cheshire Duo had no prior violent crime convictions, or that every psych evaluation is a vector for future violent criminal activity.
So will the authoritarians pour from the cracks to point out that had he been decapitated when he performed his first crime as a juvenile, this never would have happened? Will the bleeding hearts praise the sentencing and demand more rehabilitation? Perhaps the safety nannies will demand gun-free zone signs posted on all residences in Palm Beach, and the word "gun" removed from all literature? Since background checks didn't remove this man's will to do crime, or prevent him from getting a weapon, perhaps the NRA would consider lobbying to include all government records in NICS for people named "Anthony"? Was the weapon painted black? Did it have a flash supressor, folding stock, high-cap magazine or a pistol grip? Maybe there needs to be a black market Form 4473 with the additional question: "Are you going to shoot your girlfriend in the face with this weapon?"
Sorry, but I'm so sick of the stupidity and waste created by people would wouldn't know which end the bullet comes out of, and would probably foul their underwear if someone discharged an air gun 500 feet away. The threat of violence doesn't demand disarmament, and it doesn't demand a bureaucratic process, it demands the fastest and deadliest possible response by the potential victim. Now they have to spend thousands of dollars to hunt down this bastard, and try his crime in a court, all while he may commit more crimes to evade capture. Wouldn't it have been more efficient to simply stop him in the act?
A suggestion:
http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/5777/asuggestionin8.jpg
Post a Comment