This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
In 1975, Hillary had just graduated from Yale, and had just received her law licence. She was making plans to get married to Bill. She had just landed a job with a prominent anti-war attorney's law firm.
She says she tried to join the Marines, and HE says it was the Army.
You know, I think these two don't even know when they're lying any more.
bob r, that is something of which I was unaware, but I must say it held no surprise for me at all.
there is a word that starts with a "c" that I always hesitate to use because it is so ugly and also because my wife would hit me for it. But even she has used it to describe the abomination under discussion. It is fitting. She is like one court's decision about pornography, she has no redeeming virtues.
Isn't this just a grand election cycle, a sociopathic megalomaniacal liar, a sociopathic megalomaniacal racist and liar, and a sociopathic megalomaniacal opponent of the first amendment?
8 comments:
In 1975, Hillary had just graduated from Yale, and had just received her law licence. She was making plans to get married to Bill. She had just landed a job with a prominent anti-war attorney's law firm.
She says she tried to join the Marines, and HE says it was the Army.
You know, I think these two don't even know when they're lying any more.
"Sniper fire is getting pretty thick around here."
You know, it's true--just this morning I had to perform a corkscrew landing* at work and run across the parking lot to the door with my head down.
*No easy trick in a '99 Malibu, let me tell you.
Re: Firing Hillary Rodham
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
Does any more really need to be said?
Note: he fired her in 1974.
You're right, it *is* getting a bit thick, but it's not from any gunfire... :)
David, I have to stop here, my tears are making my keyboard smoke and my ribs hurt. great blogging today.
I may have just vomited in my mouth. The Marines would have eaten the bitch for lunch, spit out the bones and fed the remains to their bulldog.
hopefully not Nicki, I would hate to see Marines poisoned.
bob r, that is something of which I was unaware, but I must say it held no surprise for me at all.
there is a word that starts with a "c" that I always hesitate to use because it is so ugly and also because my wife would hit me for it. But even she has used it to describe the abomination under discussion. It is fitting. She is like one court's decision about pornography, she has no redeeming virtues.
Isn't this just a grand election cycle, a sociopathic megalomaniacal liar, a sociopathic megalomaniacal racist and liar, and a sociopathic megalomaniacal opponent of the first amendment?
I think I will write in Alfred E. Neuman.
Post a Comment