This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I look for a story like this any day: "Nigel Smallfaucet, an engineer at the plant that builds the state of the art Typhoon fighter jet, was arrested yesterday for possession of a pointed stick in his home. Smallfaucet explained that it was the pencil he uses to do the crossword in the Times, but authorities determined that it exceeded the maximum legal length."
I kind of like the idea that arms sales to foreign governments should be completely banned. Arms sales to foreign individuals should be okay provided that the sale is not just a "back door" way of selling to the foreign government.
Not a bad idea for sales to the American governments either: the sale is to the government employee who becomes the owner of the weapon -- even if the government pays for it and even if the person leaves government service. I.e., the government should not own any arms; people employed by the government should have the ownership -- including the military as relates to "small" arms.
bob: it's a whole lot easier to work out if you just eliminate government from the equation entirely. for example: ban government participation in the marketplace, entirely.
4 comments:
I look for a story like this any day: "Nigel Smallfaucet, an engineer at the plant that builds the state of the art Typhoon fighter jet, was arrested yesterday for possession of a pointed stick in his home. Smallfaucet explained that it was the pencil he uses to do the crossword in the Times, but authorities determined that it exceeded the maximum legal length."
Sounds like the Arabs are planning a party.
I kind of like the idea that arms sales to foreign governments should be completely banned. Arms sales to foreign individuals should be okay provided that the sale is not just a "back door" way of selling to the foreign government.
Not a bad idea for sales to the American governments either: the sale is to the government employee who becomes the owner of the weapon -- even if the government pays for it and even if the person leaves government service. I.e., the government should not own any arms; people employed by the government should have the ownership -- including the military as relates to "small" arms.
bob: it's a whole lot easier to work out if you just eliminate government from the equation entirely. for example: ban government participation in the marketplace, entirely.
now I like THAT idea. Just think how little tax money they'd need...no $6000 toilets or whatever the hell it was.
Of course that would leave them with lots more time to dream up control schemes....
Post a Comment