This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
they're just products of their environment, y'see. the guns got together and had themselves a meeting about those misguided youth and wayward substance abusers, setting a target rate of recidivism on their behalf.
Three in four people caught with guns avoid jail
"The latest figures show that less than one in 3 now ends up in jail. This is a far cry from the zero tolerance approach promised by this government."
is it just me or is the math wrong? if one in three end up in jail, then two in three avoid jail. how can the statistic be both 2/3 and 3/4?
In 2003 one in two people convicted of gun possession were sent to prison.
and why does the intro sentence talk about "criminals found with a gun" and how they "escape prison?"
are they criminals before they're found to have a gun, or were they criminals, but then later found in possession?
did they go to prison but then release themselves on their own cognizance? or did they avoid conviction?
The disarmers may think that they are scoring political points by saddling the (innocent) opposition with onerous "gun law" restrictions--punishing them for someone else's improper sentencing or incomplete investigations--but what is really happening is that crime rates are unaffected and safety is not enhanced, all while government costs increase due to wasted effort cataloging inanimate objects, and attempting to badger crooks with minor violations of prohibition law.
Urban social engineering is a failure so enormous, that its practitioners have no other choice but to use the disarmament cause as a dumping ground, and hope no one will notice the stink of the land fill. Whenever you hear some politician start blaming guns for his city's problems, just imagine a huge, red "FAILURE" tattoo on his forehead, and concern yourself no further with his words, but with who will be his replacement.
2 comments:
they're just products of their environment, y'see. the guns got together and had themselves a meeting about those misguided youth and wayward substance abusers, setting a target rate of recidivism on their behalf.
Three in four people caught with guns avoid jail
"The latest figures show that less than one in 3 now ends up in jail. This is a far cry from the zero tolerance approach promised by this government."
is it just me or is the math wrong? if one in three end up in jail, then two in three avoid jail. how can the statistic be both 2/3 and 3/4?
In 2003 one in two people convicted of gun possession were sent to prison.
and why does the intro sentence talk about "criminals found with a gun" and how they "escape prison?"
are they criminals before they're found to have a gun, or were they criminals, but then later found in possession?
did they go to prison but then release themselves on their own cognizance? or did they avoid conviction?
The disarmers may think that they are scoring political points by saddling the (innocent) opposition with onerous "gun law" restrictions--punishing them for someone else's improper sentencing or incomplete investigations--but what is really happening is that crime rates are unaffected and safety is not enhanced, all while government costs increase due to wasted effort cataloging inanimate objects, and attempting to badger crooks with minor violations of prohibition law.
Urban social engineering is a failure so enormous, that its practitioners have no other choice but to use the disarmament cause as a dumping ground, and hope no one will notice the stink of the land fill. Whenever you hear some politician start blaming guns for his city's problems, just imagine a huge, red "FAILURE" tattoo on his forehead, and concern yourself no further with his words, but with who will be his replacement.
Post a Comment