With these stakes, The Times' critique is serious, all the more so because Halbrook has earned such an august reputation, not just as a lawyer, but as one of the foremost scholars and champions of the right to keep and bear arms. There's nothing stated in the editorial he doesn't know inside and out. [More]Today's Gun Rights Examiner column looks at an omission with potentially disastrous consequences.
Also link over to today's Trigger Sports LIVE!
Tell a friend?
1 comment:
Perhaps he thought it was self-evident?
Or maybe because, as an "Esquire", he is an officer of the Court.
Quien Nariz?
Post a Comment