I looked around the room and saw an NRA poster on the wall and several Uzis with full clips lying on a table without trigger locks. I also noticed I had a Glock holstered on my belt beneath the white robe. [More]See, if you're a gun owner and you're not a "progressive," you're a Klansman.
Richard Latimer said it, so it must be true. And we can see for ourselves how wise and truthful he is.
7 comments:
Yep. If we believe that the Constitution means what it says, we are racist bigots, period, end of discussion, it's over, we don't get to refute.
I don't have to use Obama's skin color to determine that he's a communist and a racist. I can tell that by the way he governs.
I wish Latimer had stayed in that dream-inducing coma, or died of fright from his "nightmare".
"Richard Latimer is a 1972 graduate of U. Mass, Amherst and a 1975 graduate of the Columbia University School of Law and was admitted to the Massachusetts Bar in 1975, the U.S. District Court, D. Mass. in 1976, and the First Circuit Court of Appeals in 1977. "
With biased asshats like this no wonder you can't get a fair trial.
That's right Richard - everyone who owns a Glock is a "teabagging" Klansman racist.
Seems that projection is a real problem with some of these anti-liberty types.
Latimer's idiotic post is an affront to MLK's "I had a dream" speech. He's probably so thick he doesn't get it.
Latimer's hate speech isn't hate speech, apparently, and calling whites "white devils" isn't either, according to Al Sharpton. But shouting "Freeedom!" is.
"This is not an assault." -- The FBI to the Branch Davidians at Waco as Combat Engineering Vehicles pushed in walls.
We know where we stand.
That has to be one of the worst cases of projection I've seen in years.
Latimer, a progressive/fascist, attempts to tar others with what he actually is. One can determine that by watching The History of Political Correctness.
Attended Columbia Law School about the time Herbert Marcuse was there, figures.
Latimer is a full on Marxian fascist (yes, they exist).
The Klan operated in anonymity out of fear. The Tea Party meets in public, unmasked, and has been very, very patient and slow to anger.
The Klan wanted to maintain a sense of superiority over those who were different. The Tea Party wants to be left alone.
Which side does THIS sound like (the Nuremburg Laws banishing certain people from public office, public facilities, and eventually, life itself):
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005681
I have every intention of living up to my enemies worst fears, and being the stuff of their nightmares.III.
Post a Comment