Friday, November 26, 2010

Gray Lady Soils Self in Anti-Gun Tizzy

So much concentrated PSH in one brief editorial. [More]

Bleat your worst, Times editorial board. Your treachery has been duly noted.

6 comments:

Pat H. said...

There were so many rational comments opposed to the NYT editorial they've stopped taking them.

Defender said...

Still fixated on the NRA as the great enemy. That's hilarious. They really have no clue.

Mack said...

But they have the right to vote -- what does the NYT think of that?

Anonymous said...

I wonder if they are including the young men and women in the armed forces?

Crotalus (Don't Tread on Me) said...

Apparently not much, Mack. It looks to me like they culled a lot of pro-gun comments and kept every one that supported their agenda. I say that because I just don't believe that the ratio of anti-gun to pro-gun comments is real.

Ned said...

Excellent idea. In sum, following the logical path, the NYT believes the U.S. shouldn't allow anyone under the age of 21 into the military.

Heaven forbid that an 18 year old armed National Guardsman be allowed to patrol the streets of NY armed, of called to duty.