This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
Dave missed a fabulous opportunity on a crucial talking point. And in doing so he fell into the squishy agenda-based-news-driven hand wringing meme.
At the beginning of the video clip he pointed out that CT is among the most rampantly "gun" "controlling" states in the union. Then he said, the question is what to do about such tragedies.
NO. The question is, with all these thousands of laws already on the books, exactly which magic "gun" "control" law will suddenly convert lawbreakers--who are breaking all of these laws already, as well as others (including laws against murder)--into law-abiding citizens?
Laws are for the law-abiding. Those determined to break the law cannot be reined in by law. Citizens understand and respect law. Predators and maniacs respect and comprehend only force. They stage dramas of force.
The real issue here is that most parents don't have the cojones to protect their own. If they did, in places where these incidents have happened, parents would be organizing to let everyone know that direct, deliberate threats to their children's safety and lives will be met with lethal force.
We already have lots of gun control. It is demonstrated not to work. Lawbreakers don't follow laws. This is so obvious that one would think we wouldn't have to point it out.
But we do. Again and again and again, and I advocate to all my 2A/RKBA friends--liberal, conservative, and everywhere in between--that they keep making this point in coming weeks and months. Exactly what law is going to magically turn lawbreakers and predators into law-abiding citizens?
2 comments:
"Anti gun-control advocate"? That's some seriously twisted newspeak.
Why not simply gun rights advocate or freedom advocate?
Dave missed a fabulous opportunity on a crucial talking point. And in doing so he fell into the squishy agenda-based-news-driven hand wringing meme.
At the beginning of the video clip he pointed out that CT is among the most rampantly "gun" "controlling" states in the union. Then he said, the question is what to do about such tragedies.
NO. The question is, with all these thousands of laws already on the books, exactly which magic "gun" "control" law will suddenly convert lawbreakers--who are breaking all of these laws already, as well as others (including laws against murder)--into law-abiding citizens?
Laws are for the law-abiding. Those determined to break the law cannot be reined in by law. Citizens understand and respect law. Predators and maniacs respect and comprehend only force. They stage dramas of force.
The real issue here is that most parents don't have the cojones to protect their own. If they did, in places where these incidents have happened, parents would be organizing to let everyone know that direct, deliberate threats to their children's safety and lives will be met with lethal force.
We already have lots of gun control. It is demonstrated not to work. Lawbreakers don't follow laws. This is so obvious that one would think we wouldn't have to point it out.
But we do. Again and again and again, and I advocate to all my 2A/RKBA friends--liberal, conservative, and everywhere in between--that they keep making this point in coming weeks and months. Exactly what law is going to magically turn lawbreakers and predators into law-abiding citizens?
Post a Comment