This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
Well I doubt somewhat that Hollywood is truly willing to claim Mad TV as their own. Any more than they are willing to claim certain actors or directors, no matter HOW GOOD their works.
Uh... If the purse is snatched from her like in the first demonstration, the woman will be unable to retrieve it like in the last demonstration. The thief has your cash, credit cards, drivers license, weapon and makeup!
I hate to tell you this, Longbow, but the video validates what a crock of shit the "self-defense" training preferred by Proglodytes really is worth. And it shows that a gun is a great equalizer. Now indeed their handling of that gun does bring to mind the recent Ms. Magazine farce, but even there they do not appear to be as foolishly scared as THAT writer was. But then maybe I'm just too dense and they're working their skit on a whole different plane from what I see.
"Martial arts" style self defense training is far from useless, as long as you find a good instructor who is willing to do realistic training. That being said, it's only one layer in a well planned defense, and should be thought of as primarily being useful in the areas of weapon retention, or in creating space to draw a weapon or flee. Remember, unlike today back when martial arts were front line techniques, weapon training was the primary focus. It's only in more modern times that weapon skills have been pushed to the side, or totally banished. It fits the liberal mindset of "empowerment" to give people some small measure of unrealistic training, which then results in a false sense of confidence. the same could be said though of putting a firearm in untrained hands. Most people in the modern age simply do not have the time or money to put into good training, and really, no reason to do so, since it's so unlikely that they will actually need it.
Carrying a gun deludes most men and women into thinking they can defend against muggers and such. But, try drawing your gun while mounted by someone 100lbs heavier and who's hitting your face with elbows and fists. Likewise, try to draw when someone is choking you from behind.
Experience the horror of not being able to breathe and not being able to reach your gun and then, maybe you have a picture of true reality.
6 comments:
Well I doubt somewhat that Hollywood is truly willing to claim Mad TV as their own. Any more than they are willing to claim certain actors or directors, no matter HOW GOOD their works.
Uh... If the purse is snatched from her like in the first demonstration, the woman will be unable to retrieve it like in the last demonstration. The thief has your cash, credit cards, drivers license, weapon and makeup!
Small, little detail.
That is what passes for funny to a nest of Liberals? It was so stupid it was unwatchable.
I hate to tell you this, Longbow, but the video validates what a crock of shit the "self-defense" training preferred by Proglodytes really is worth. And it shows that a gun is a great equalizer. Now indeed their handling of that gun does bring to mind the recent Ms. Magazine farce, but even there they do not appear to be as foolishly scared as THAT writer was. But then maybe I'm just too dense and they're working their skit on a whole different plane from what I see.
"Martial arts" style self defense training is far from useless, as long as you find a good instructor who is willing to do realistic training. That being said, it's only one layer in a well planned defense, and should be thought of as primarily being useful in the areas of weapon retention, or in creating space to draw a weapon or flee.
Remember, unlike today back when martial arts were front line techniques, weapon training was the primary focus. It's only in more modern times that weapon skills have been pushed to the side, or totally banished.
It fits the liberal mindset of "empowerment" to give people some small measure of unrealistic training, which then results in a false sense of confidence. the same could be said though of putting a firearm in untrained hands.
Most people in the modern age simply do not have the time or money to put into good training, and really, no reason to do so, since it's so unlikely that they will actually need it.
Carrying a gun deludes most men and women into thinking they can defend against muggers and such. But, try drawing your gun while mounted by someone 100lbs heavier and who's hitting your face with elbows and fists. Likewise, try to draw when someone is choking you from behind.
Experience the horror of not being able to breathe and not being able to reach your gun and then, maybe you have a picture of true reality.
Post a Comment